03.09.2014 Views

AGENDA - Sunshine Coast Council

AGENDA - Sunshine Coast Council

AGENDA - Sunshine Coast Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Strategy and Planning Committee Agenda 16 February 2011<br />

The scale of proposed development on the subject site is no greater than that envisaged by<br />

Caloundra City Plan. Consequently, the subject development has been allowed for in<br />

determining the trunk road infrastructure requirements and related financial contributions<br />

payable by development as part of Planning Scheme Policy No. 11.22 (Infrastructure<br />

Contributions for Road Network Infrastructure) 2009. Road projects nominated in Planning<br />

Scheme Policy No. 11.22 in the general area south of Caloundra Road that development<br />

(including the proposed development) is required to contribute towards include:<br />

• Baldwin Street (Bowman Road to North Street) - four lanes;<br />

• Burke Street (Blaxland Street to Pelican Waters Boulevard) - two lane extension;<br />

• North Street (Park Place to Baldwin Street) - road capacity improvements;<br />

• North Street (Baldwin Street to Pelican Waters Boulevard) - two lane extension; and<br />

• Landsborough Parade (Golden Beach) - intersection improvements.<br />

The actual financial contributions payable by the applicant towards projects on the major<br />

road network will be determined under the <strong>Council</strong> infrastructure contributions policy current<br />

at the time each stage of the development is carried out.<br />

INTERNAL MAJOR STREET SYSTEM<br />

A number of major streets, operating as trunk collector streets, are proposed to provide for<br />

connectivity through the site and connectivity with adjacent development. The internal trunk<br />

collector street system consists of the following three main links:<br />

• A north-south trunk collector street through the proposed business centre precinct in<br />

the eastern part of the site, connecting to Pelican Waters Boulevard and Michael<br />

Street;<br />

• An east-west trunk collector street through the multi-unit residential precinct in the<br />

middle of the site, connecting to the proposed north-south trunk collector street in the<br />

proposed business centre precinct to the east and Bledisloe Boulevard (via the<br />

existing New Holland Drive) to the west. The applicant had proposed a rather<br />

circuitous and ambiguous route for this street; however, to improve legibility and<br />

reduce the potential for lower-order streets in the development to be utilised by<br />

through vehicle movements, a more direct route through the multi-unit residential<br />

precinct is recommended. This route would connect with the north-south trunk<br />

collector street in the middle of the business centre precinct and run along the<br />

northern side of the proposed village park; and<br />

• An east-west trunk collector street through the low density residential precinct along<br />

the southern boundary of the site, connecting to the proposed north-south trunk<br />

collector street near the eastern end of the site and directly to the end of the existing<br />

Bledisloe Boulevard at the western end of the site. The applicant had proposed this<br />

route pass to the south of the existing rural lot on the site's southern boundary;<br />

however, some of the south-east corner of the rural lot would be required to achieve<br />

this connection and avoid the adjacent marine park. Since the rural lot does not form<br />

part of the application, a trunk collector street is not able to be provided at this<br />

location. Subsequently, it is recommended the trunk collector route be required to<br />

pass through and generally along the southern boundary of the subject site, but to the<br />

north of the rural lot.<br />

Page 62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!