Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a PCM-Supported ...
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a PCM-Supported ...
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a PCM-Supported ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
where G=ρU d /ε g is the pore mass flux <strong>of</strong> the gas phase, Re=4r h G/µ g is Reynolds<br />
number, M g is the molecular weight <strong>of</strong> gas (g/mol), P a is the dry air pressure (pa), U d<br />
is the Darcian velocity <strong>of</strong> gas, <strong>and</strong> r h =ε g /a is the hydraulic radius for gas flow in the<br />
porous medium.<br />
4.2.3.6 Fluid-particle heat transfer coefficient<br />
The interfacial convective heat transfer coefficient for fluid flow in fixed packed beds<br />
(thermal regenerators), which is needed when the local thermal equilibrium between<br />
the fluid <strong>and</strong> solid phases breaks down, is a very important factor in the heat transfer<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> the storage medium. It is known that the heat transfer performance<br />
<strong>of</strong> thermal regenerators is dependent upon many other factors, for example, the heat<br />
exchanger design, the physical properties <strong>of</strong> the heat transfer fluid, etc. Among<br />
them, the heat transfer coefficient between the packing (solid phase) <strong>and</strong> the heat<br />
transfer fluid (h sf ) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important factors, which may strongly influence<br />
the heat transfer performance <strong>of</strong> the regenerator. Therefore, careful selection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
heat transfer coefficient correlation from literature is important. Various approaches<br />
<strong>and</strong> correlations for determining the interfacial convective heat transfer coefficient<br />
between the bed packing <strong>and</strong> the working fluid are discussed <strong>and</strong> compared in<br />
Appendix (C).<br />
The correlation <strong>of</strong> Wakao <strong>and</strong> Kaguei [15] was used for the fluid/solid heat transfer<br />
coefficient in both the single <strong>and</strong> two phase flow regenerators, where “fluid” st<strong>and</strong>s<br />
for either liquid or gas phase. Wakao <strong>and</strong> Kaguei [15] have experimentally<br />
examined the results on h sf for both steady <strong>and</strong> transient behaviors <strong>and</strong> reached to a<br />
reliable correlation. They have found the following correlation for h sf for spherical<br />
particles (or the dimensionless form <strong>of</strong> it; the Nusselt number):<br />
Nu<br />
d<br />
h<br />
1<br />
sf<br />
dp<br />
.6 3<br />
2.0 1.1Re 0 Pr<br />
(4.54)<br />
k<br />
f<br />
Where Re=u p d p / =u D d p /; where u p <strong>and</strong> u D are the average pore velocity (bulk<br />
mean velocity) <strong>and</strong> the Darcian velocity <strong>of</strong> the fluid respectively. However, Wakao<br />
<strong>and</strong> Kaguei correlation neglects the axial diffusion effects <strong>and</strong> is valid only for<br />
packed beds with ( ≈ 0.4). The Jefferson degradation factor [14] was introduced in<br />
the fluid-solid heat transfer coefficients to account for the conduction resistance<br />
inside the <strong>PCM</strong> spheres while using a one-dimensional model for the packed bed as<br />
mentioned earlier <strong>and</strong> described by equation (4.9).<br />
Figure (4.6) compares the values <strong>of</strong> effective heat transfer coefficients obtained with<br />
four different Nusselt correlations (described in appendix C) for the flow through a<br />
spherical packing in dependency on the Reynolds Number. The values differ<br />
significantly from each other, which could be due to differences in experimental<br />
boundary conditions under which these correlations were determined. The<br />
85