Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a PCM-Supported ...
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a PCM-Supported ...
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a PCM-Supported ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
T T<br />
<br />
<br />
amb<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
col 0.60 0.0078 7<br />
(4.78)<br />
Iincident<br />
<br />
The above efficiency includes the heat losses through the connecting pipes <strong>and</strong> the<br />
flow mal-distribution in the collector absorber due to low water flow rate used [2]. The<br />
FPC efficiencies available in the market nowadays are usually higher than those<br />
given by equation (4.78). However, this might provide conservative values <strong>of</strong> fresh<br />
water production, especially as this equation was developed under the climatic<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> Jordan in the Middle East.<br />
Like any kind <strong>of</strong> energy conversion devices, the efficiency <strong>of</strong> a solar collector<br />
resembles the ratio between the rate <strong>of</strong> thermal energy extracted by the working<br />
medium (usable output heat) Q u <strong>and</strong> the incident solar irradiation I<br />
incident<br />
(W.m -2 )<br />
crossing the aperture area (A col ) <strong>of</strong> the collector:<br />
<br />
Q<br />
<br />
Q<br />
u<br />
u<br />
<br />
col<br />
<br />
(4.79)<br />
<br />
Q<br />
IincidentAcol<br />
in,<br />
col<br />
The rate <strong>of</strong> input thermal energy through the solar collector determines the inlet<br />
temperature to the thermal buffer T w8 (i.e. the outlet water temperature from the FPC)<br />
under transient conditions:<br />
Q<br />
in, col col col incident hw w w8<br />
w7<br />
<br />
<br />
A I M c T T<br />
(4.80)<br />
4.5.6 Energy balance on heat exchangers<br />
For both heat exchangers involved in the HDH process as depicted in figure 1 (i.e.<br />
the brine heater <strong>and</strong> water cooler in the condenser closed cycle) the energy balance<br />
calculations follow the same approach as Polifke <strong>and</strong> Kopitz [60]. In both cases a<br />
countercurrent regime is chosen due to its high effectiveness. In fact the brine heater<br />
has a direct influence on the recovery rate <strong>of</strong> latent heat <strong>of</strong> condensation while the<br />
water cooler has a high influence on the condenser performance. Moreover, the two<br />
heat exchangers implicitly have mutual influences on each other.<br />
In the brine heater, the margin between the outlet hot stream temperature <strong>and</strong> the<br />
outlet cold stream temperature (T w9 -T w7 ) is assumed to be 3K for simplification. For<br />
the water cooler, the temperature <strong>of</strong> the fresh cold water at the top <strong>of</strong> the condenser<br />
is not allowed to be more than (T amb +3)K. Thus, the design <strong>of</strong> the heat exchangers is<br />
confined in determining the maximum heat transfer surface area on yearly basis<br />
under transient operation conditions:<br />
96