Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a PCM-Supported ...
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a PCM-Supported ...
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a PCM-Supported ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
operating limits. In light <strong>of</strong> the literature survey in chapter 2, the varying parameters<br />
include mainly inlet hot water temperature to the evaporator, mass flow rates <strong>of</strong> hot<br />
water <strong>and</strong> air, <strong>and</strong> packing height.<br />
Moreover, the experiments are designed to examine both natural convection<br />
conditions <strong>and</strong> using Non-<strong>PCM</strong> (Empty plastic spheres having the same size as<br />
<strong>PCM</strong> spheres, <strong>and</strong> Hiflow industrial packing elements) elements for comparative<br />
tests.<br />
In the very early stage <strong>of</strong> the experiments, the effect <strong>of</strong> inlet cooling water mass flow<br />
rate to the condenser on plant productivity was examined under six types <strong>of</strong><br />
boundary conditions using <strong>PCM</strong> packing without distillate cooler. The results showed<br />
that this influence is very small within the planned range <strong>of</strong> mass flow rates. Thus,<br />
the inlet cooling water mass flow rate <strong>and</strong> temperature were constantly maintained at<br />
a higher level <strong>of</strong> 670 l/h, <strong>and</strong> around 21°C respectively to exclude the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
cooling water conditions on plant productivity. However, the effect <strong>of</strong> inlet cooling<br />
water mass flow rate <strong>and</strong> temperature as crucial parameters under real operation<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> the HDH system will be studied numerically in the next chapters.<br />
Based on the previous calibration data, the water pumps <strong>and</strong> ventilator are<br />
accurately adjusted at the predefined flow rates to guarantee fixed boundary<br />
conditions for similar tests. Moreover, eight repeatability-prove tests were conducted<br />
on both <strong>PCM</strong> <strong>and</strong> Non-<strong>PCM</strong> packing types <strong>and</strong> found repeatable within less than<br />
5%.<br />
The subsequent sections compare <strong>and</strong> discuss the results obtained by employing<br />
different packing types to show the influence <strong>of</strong> operation parameters on the plant<br />
performance. First <strong>of</strong> all, the thermal behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>PCM</strong> evaporator <strong>and</strong> condenser will<br />
be discussed in comparison with the empty spheres packing through one sample <strong>of</strong><br />
experimentation runs. The six cases or combinations <strong>of</strong> boundary conditions which<br />
are indicated in table (5.2) were selected from the experimental plan in table (A.2) in<br />
the Appendix (A). The selected experiments were conducted on both <strong>PCM</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
empty spheres at two levels <strong>of</strong> packing height for studying the effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>PCM</strong><br />
compared to Non-<strong>PCM</strong> packing. Additionally, the same set <strong>of</strong> experiments were<br />
conducted on industrial packing elements called “Hiflow packing” at lower packing<br />
height under forced <strong>and</strong> natural convection.<br />
In the first <strong>and</strong> fourth case <strong>of</strong> boundary conditions in table (5.1), both <strong>of</strong> them have a<br />
higher inlet water temperature (83 ºC). The first case has high inlet mass flow rate <strong>of</strong><br />
water (500 l/h) to the evaporator, <strong>and</strong> high air velocity (0.55 m/s), while the fourth<br />
case has the lower levels <strong>of</strong> both inlet water mass flow (250 l/h) <strong>and</strong> air velocity (0.23<br />
m/s) in the system. This means that the first case has the highest heat capacity flow<br />
rates, while the fourth case has the lowest for both water <strong>and</strong> air in the system, but<br />
air to water mass flow ratio is nearly the same.<br />
109