11.10.2014 Views

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1lI-18<br />

Data <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>jection flow rates and pressures and <strong>the</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g aquifer's per<strong>for</strong>mance need to be<br />

assessed more completely. Data useful <strong>for</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g total quantity of fluids received by <strong>the</strong> reservoir<br />

appear not to be generally available. However, secondary recovery data from <strong>the</strong> Railroad Commission<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>in</strong>jection pressures vary from atmospheric to 2,400 psia at wellhead. Wellhead flow rates<br />

<strong>in</strong> secondary recovery operations are reported to range from 75 to 10,000 BBLlDay with <strong>the</strong> majority<br />

under 5,000 BBLlDay. Accumulated <strong>in</strong>jection ranges up to 85 x 1(1 BBL <strong>in</strong>jected s<strong>in</strong>ce 1936. The<br />

secondary recovery data <strong>in</strong>dicates only what <strong>in</strong>jection rates and accumulated storage volumes have been<br />

achieved. As oil reservoir eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g will prevail, actual rates and storage volumes may be very far<br />

from those achievable or optimum <strong>for</strong> fluid disposal. The pressures used may be more <strong>in</strong>dicative of those<br />

required <strong>for</strong> disposal, although <strong>the</strong> average porosities and permeabilities of <strong>the</strong> traps or structures, from<br />

which petroleum production derives, may not be <strong>in</strong>dicative of those properties <strong>in</strong> sand bodies <strong>in</strong> large<br />

blocks.<br />

The data available from oil and gas operations does not provide sufficient detail or evidence <strong>for</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> potential of subsurface disposal because most of <strong>the</strong>se are proprietary.<br />

SPECIALIST OPINION - SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL<br />

Two specialist organizations have provided op<strong>in</strong>ion concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>for</strong> subsurface disposal. A<br />

drill<strong>in</strong>g and services organization considers that <strong>in</strong>jection of 20,000 BBLlDay <strong>in</strong>to 5 - 6,000 foot wells<br />

of reasonable cost is possible. Such wells might <strong>in</strong>ject up to 400,000 BBLlDay <strong>in</strong>to a large reservoir<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g 20 wells. If operated <strong>for</strong> 15 years, <strong>the</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g reservoir will need to store 2.2 x 1()I' BBL. (") A<br />

second specialist organization notes that up to 1,000 gallons per m<strong>in</strong>ute (35,000 BBLlDay) can be <strong>in</strong>jected<br />

<strong>in</strong>to a 5,000 to 6,OOO-foot well. Such a well would have a good-sized <strong>in</strong>jection tub<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a<br />

gravel-packed, under-reamed <strong>in</strong>jection section.<br />

The latter organization po<strong>in</strong>ted out that, <strong>in</strong> order to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>for</strong> subsurface disposal, <strong>the</strong><br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g steps are necessary:<br />

(1) Geological mapp<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> subsurface sands us<strong>in</strong>g well log data.<br />

(2) Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of porosity and permeability us<strong>in</strong>g core data and well log data.<br />

(3) Reservoir eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g calculations.<br />

(4) Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary design of <strong>in</strong>jection wells and <strong>in</strong>jection well surface equipment.<br />

(5) Slim hole bor<strong>in</strong>g program with cor<strong>in</strong>g, reservoir fluid sampl<strong>in</strong>g, and production test<strong>in</strong>g<br />

programs.<br />

(*) 2.2 Billion Barrels or Ca. 2,700,000 acre-feet.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!