11.10.2014 Views

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to coastal barrier sandstone on <strong>the</strong> west to distal shoreface sands<br />

on <strong>the</strong> east.<br />

Individual sands with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section th<strong>in</strong> and show a<br />

more marked variation <strong>in</strong> resistivity.<br />

With<strong>in</strong> Reservoir Area C,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Bond Sand occurs with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terval from 8,550 to 9,520 feet <strong>in</strong> well No.5, to 11,670 to<br />

12,220 <strong>in</strong> well No.3 (Fig. 5). The average depth is 10,626 feet,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> average thickness is 635 feet. The net sand average is 334<br />

feet, or 53 per cent sand.<br />

Pressure at <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong> sand<br />

averages 8,045 psi, and <strong>the</strong> average gradient is 0.76 psi! ft.<br />

Average temperature (A.A.P.G. corrected) is 296°F. Temperatures are<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> higher than <strong>the</strong> average nearer <strong>the</strong> center of <strong>the</strong> reservoir.<br />

Porosity and permeability were estimated from <strong>the</strong> resistivity and<br />

spontaneous potential character of <strong>the</strong> logs.<br />

These values were<br />

compared to reported values, and <strong>the</strong> lower values were used <strong>for</strong><br />

simulation purposes. Porosity averages 18 per cent, and<br />

permeability 13.8 md. The average KH is 4,609.<br />

The spontaneous potential curves were not good <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong><br />

wells; <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, estimates of sand characteristics were derived<br />

primarily from <strong>the</strong> resistivity curves.<br />

Log characteristics would<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> Bond Sand to be a more distal f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed shoreface<br />

sand with less rework<strong>in</strong>g of sediment than <strong>the</strong> Marks Sand.<br />

Like <strong>the</strong> Marks Sand, which was deposited <strong>in</strong> shallower water,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Bond Sand dips from east to west towards <strong>the</strong> McAllen fault, and<br />

thickens towards <strong>the</strong> fault. A flatten<strong>in</strong>g of dip also occurs toward<br />

<strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast along <strong>the</strong> axis of <strong>the</strong> high which extends from<br />

Ed<strong>in</strong>burg to Donna (Fig. 2).<br />

II-10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!