11.10.2014 Views

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX G<br />

4 DEC 1993<br />

TO:<br />

MR. KLEBER DENNY<br />

Terra Associates, Inc.<br />

Houston, Texas<br />

FM: EUGENE R. REAHL<br />

Ionics, Inc.<br />

5455 Garden Grove Blvd<br />

Suite 321<br />

Westm<strong>in</strong>ster, CA 92683<br />

cc: EPG, JWArnold,<br />

R. Johnson, £ile<br />

tel: 713-993-0333<br />

£ax: 713-993-0743<br />

tel: 714-893-1545<br />

£ax: 714-892-1592<br />

SUB:<br />

PRELIMINARY EDR / RO COSTS & PERFORMANCE STUDY<br />

REF:<br />

State o£ Texas <strong>Water</strong> Development Board Grant<br />

Ionics M-10 (TX)<br />

Reviewed your water data £or GROUP 1 thru GROUP 4 conditions. We<br />

used <strong>the</strong> "mean" water analysis £or each group <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> EDR vs RO comparisons.<br />

We also used <strong>the</strong> range o£ feedwater pH's £or each group<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n took <strong>the</strong> average (high + low) / 2 plus about 20% £or our<br />

calculations. We used 24 degrees C as <strong>the</strong> £eed temp <strong>in</strong> all cases.<br />

(1) Per our discussion, rough data <strong>in</strong>dicates GROUP 1 thru GROUP<br />

4 waters conta<strong>in</strong> levels o£ Boron (above 1.4 ppm) which will cause severe<br />

problems £or £ruits, plants, and o<strong>the</strong>r grow<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs. Although<br />

Bo causes problems £or plants, you and I can dr<strong>in</strong>k same up to 45 ppm<br />

with no problem!! EDR does not remove boron at normal pH. RO requires<br />

elevated pH, as well, £or e££ective reduction. As discussed,<br />

we've ignored boron removal <strong>in</strong> this study. Keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d though, i£<br />

Bo reduction is required, both EDR and RO could reduce same by hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> £eed water pH raised to 8.5 - 9.5. This requires a presoften<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system <strong>in</strong>stallation (ei<strong>the</strong>r lime or lime-soda clarification or soften<strong>in</strong>g<br />

RO membranes) - so that 2nd phase EDR or RO system will not<br />

su££er catastrophic membrane scal<strong>in</strong>g due to high pH.<br />

(2) S<strong>in</strong>ce you asked £or high water recovery to m<strong>in</strong>imize br<strong>in</strong>e<br />

disposal via <strong>in</strong>jection wells - this was our overrid<strong>in</strong>g objective <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> study. The RO design pushed water recovery to a limit of 180 to<br />

~ ppm Si02 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> br<strong>in</strong>e £or GROUP 1 thru GROUP 3. For GROUP 4 (be­<br />

.use Si02 is low), we used 85% as a normal upper limit. Due to <strong>the</strong><br />

level o£ Calcium and Bicarbonate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> "mean" water analysis £or<br />

each GROUP, RO requires <strong>the</strong> £eed<strong>in</strong>g of sulfuric acid to £eedwater <strong>in</strong><br />

each case, to control <strong>the</strong> level of CaC03 scal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> RO br<strong>in</strong>e.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!