11.10.2014 Views

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

(GP/GT) for Additional Water Supply in the Lower Rio Grande

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FLUID PROPERTIES<br />

Gas Gas <strong>Water</strong> Sol'n <strong>Water</strong><br />

Pressure FVF Visc FVF Gas Visco<br />

pSla rb/Mcf cp rb/STB Scf/STB cp<br />

------------ --------- -------- -------- ---------- --------<br />

1000.00 3.1957 .0140 1.0368 5.4 .30<br />

2000.00 1.5359 .0160 1.0338 9.7 .30<br />

3000.00 1.0276 .0188 1.0307 13.2 .30<br />

4000.00 .8084 .0215 1.0276 16.0 .30<br />

5000.00 .6899 .0243 1.0246 18.4 .30<br />

6000.00 .6154 .0270 1.0215 20.6 .30<br />

7000.00 -.5659 .0295 1.0185 22.5 .30<br />

8000.00 .5311 .0319 1.0154 24.2 .30<br />

9000.00 .5047 .0341 1.0123 25.8 .30<br />

10000.00 .4831 .0362 1.0093 27.3 .30<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> reservoir flow is all s<strong>in</strong>gle phase water, relative permeability curves<br />

are not needed nor is structure important s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> sands will be <strong>in</strong> hydraulic equilibrium.<br />

This completes <strong>the</strong> data needed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> reservoir description.<br />

The wells were described us<strong>in</strong>g large diameter flow str<strong>in</strong>g (5 <strong>in</strong>ch diameter).<br />

The wells were assumed to be completely penetrat<strong>in</strong>g with a zero sk<strong>in</strong>. The flow restriction<br />

was 25,000 bblld (approximately 1,000,000 gal/day) or what <strong>the</strong> well could<br />

deliver aga<strong>in</strong>st a 5500 psi bottom hole flow<strong>in</strong>g pressure. Surface pressures were <strong>the</strong>n<br />

calculated from those flow<strong>in</strong>g conditions. This results <strong>in</strong> some slightly anomalous<br />

behavior <strong>in</strong> some of <strong>the</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance curves where <strong>the</strong> rate decl<strong>in</strong>es. A slightly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

wellhead pressure is computed. This is because <strong>the</strong> bottom hole pressure is<br />

held constant and <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fluid rate produces less pipe friction.<br />

Simulation Results<br />

Several simulation runs were made <strong>for</strong> each of <strong>the</strong> three identified reservoirs.<br />

First, a s<strong>in</strong>gle test well perfonnance was calculated <strong>for</strong> each reservoir <strong>for</strong> each <strong>the</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum case and maximum case. Then patterns of wells were superimposed on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

reservoir. Each reservoir had patterns of 3, 6 and 9 produc<strong>in</strong>g wells.<br />

The results of <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle test well simulations are shown on Figures 7-12. These<br />

show that <strong>the</strong> Mark Sand hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> th<strong>in</strong>nest section beg<strong>in</strong>s to decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> rate almost<br />

immediately <strong>for</strong> both <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum and maximum reservoir sizes. The Bond Sand<br />

II-16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!