08.11.2014 Views

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Psychopharmaceuticals in <strong>Europe</strong> 151<br />

effectiveness of their drug for specific psychiatric conditions, each now linked to<br />

a particular kind of <strong>an</strong>omaly in a particular aspect of a neurotr<strong>an</strong>smitter system.<br />

The new age of smart psychiatric drugs had arrived.<br />

The market for drugs<br />

Accurate comparative <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> historical data on psychiatric drug prescribing since<br />

the 1950s is not readily available. The World Health Org<strong>an</strong>ization (WHO) has<br />

adopted one particular unit as a measure of the intensity of use of pharmaceuticals.<br />

This is the defined daily dose or DDD, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a comparative st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard is<br />

emerging based on the DDD per 1000 inhabit<strong>an</strong>ts per day. 7 However, the compilation<br />

<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> publication of detailed DDD figures for psychopharmaceutical use<br />

<strong>across</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> is at <strong>an</strong> early stage <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> coverage is patchy. Other data is available<br />

from commercial org<strong>an</strong>izations that monitor the pharmaceutical industry, notably<br />

from the leading org<strong>an</strong>ization, IMS Health. In this chapter, we largely draw<br />

upon studies specially commissioned from IMS Health to illustrate some general<br />

trends <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> patterns. The IMS measure used to assess these trends is the st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard<br />

dosage unit, or SU (see Note 1 for <strong>an</strong> expl<strong>an</strong>ation of this measure) which is not<br />

directly convertible into DDDs. 8 While the interpretation of the detailed figures<br />

is subject to m<strong>an</strong>y qualifications, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> actual numbers should be regarded simply<br />

as indicative, they are sufficiently robust for these purposes.<br />

Let us begin by considering some broad regional differences. An initial <strong>overview</strong><br />

(see Table 7.1) reveals a marked rising trend in prescription of psychiatric<br />

medication in all regions from 1990 to 2000 as measured in st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard dosage<br />

units. In the more developed regions, the United States shows a growth of about<br />

70 per cent, <strong>Europe</strong> of around 44 per cent <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Jap<strong>an</strong> of about 30 per cent. In the<br />

less developed regions, South America remains remarkably const<strong>an</strong>t with a<br />

growth of only 1.6 per cent, South Africa shows a growth of about 13 per cent,<br />

but the use of prescription drugs in Pakist<strong>an</strong> has grown by over 33 per cent<br />

(although from a low base). 9<br />

This variation in the qu<strong>an</strong>tity of drug prescriptions is instructive, but we see a<br />

rather different pattern when we relate the number of st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard doses prescribed<br />

Table 7.1 Psychiatric drug prescribing 1990–2000 in selected regions (st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard dosage<br />

units, thous<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s)<br />

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000<br />

EU 30,612,851 32,975,134 34,026,814 38,169,030 40,443,452 42,464,477<br />

USA 9,965,639 11,540,978 13,830,291 16,074,244 19,001,486 18,953,979<br />

Jap<strong>an</strong> 7,817,352 8,144,026 8,398,988 8,974,334 9,243,612 10,049,994<br />

Latin America 3,696,757 3,695,284 3,515,827 3,483,267 3,521,456 3,723,646<br />

Pakist<strong>an</strong> 631,172 680,378 874,607 927,253 868,876 825,437<br />

South Africa 277,579 303,834 314,972 383,234 345,159 378,434<br />

Source: IMS Health Second Study. See Note 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!