08.11.2014 Views

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Addiction <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> alcohol 261<br />

Table 11.4 Summary of studies looking at the social cost of alcohol<br />

Country<br />

Year of<br />

cost<br />

Total cost<br />

per capita<br />

(PPS) 1<br />

Health 2<br />

Crime 3<br />

Mortality 4<br />

Absenteeism 4<br />

Belgium 1999 586 2.6% – 0.5% 0.00%<br />

Denmark<br />

Finl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1990 496–850 0.9–1.4% 13–14% 0.6–1.0% 0.05–0.06%<br />

Fr<strong>an</strong>ce 1997 261–310 2.4% 0.04–0.05%<br />

Germ<strong>an</strong>y 1995 254 2.3% 0.4% 0.08%<br />

Irel<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2003 556 4.4% 8% 0.78%<br />

Italy 1994 134–153 1.7–1.9% 0.1–0.2% 0.17–0.18%<br />

Netherl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s 2000 192 0.3% 14% 0.06%<br />

Norway 2001 429–472 0.7–1.3% 2% 0.1% 0.10–0.11%<br />

Portugal 1995 73 0.5% 1% 0.1% 0.00%<br />

UK (Scotl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>) 2001–2 296–360 1.4% 14% 0.09%<br />

Slovak Republic 1994 292 4.9% 17% 0.5% 0.66%<br />

Slovenia 2002 50 0.5% 0.3% 0.01%<br />

Spain 1998 129 2.4% 3% 0.14%<br />

Sweden 1998 1,194 5.5% 4% 1.0% 0.71%<br />

UK (Engl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

& Wales)<br />

2001 485–527 2.8–3.3% 11% 0.3% 0.14–0.20%<br />

1<br />

Inflated to 2003 prices using the Consumer Price Index (base Euro); 2 as a % of total <strong>health</strong><br />

expenditure; 3 as a % of total public order expenditure; 4 as a % of GDP.<br />

* Figures in bold are higher quality studies<br />

Source: Anderson <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Baumberg (2006)<br />

Policy options to reduce the harm done by alcohol<br />

Over the last 25 years considerable progress has been made in the scientific<br />

underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ing of the relationship between alcohol policies, alcohol consumption<br />

<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> alcohol-related harm (Bruun et al. 1975; Edwards et al. 1994; Babor<br />

et al. 2003). The evidence finds three types of policies that are effective in<br />

reducing alcohol’s burden (see Table 11.5): 1) population-based policies such as<br />

those on taxation, advertising, regulation of the density of outlets, hours <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

days of sale, drinking locations <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> minimum drinking ages; 2) problemdirected<br />

policies aimed at specific alcohol-related problems such as drinkdriving;<br />

<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 3) interventions directed at individual drinkers, such as primary<br />

care based brief interventions for hazardous <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> harmful alcohol consumption.<br />

In general, effectiveness is strong for the regulation of physical availability<br />

<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the use of alcohol taxes (Babor et al. 2003). Given the broad reach of these

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!