08.11.2014 Views

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

184 <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>health</strong> <strong>policy</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>practice</strong><br />

To access this data, we commissioned three customized studies from IMS Health<br />

based on the data that they compile from over 120 countries, which includes, for the<br />

countries chosen, drugs prescribed in hospital <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sold through retail outlets. These<br />

data provided the basis for calculations made by our team, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> IMS has no responsibility<br />

for these or our interpretations. The first two studies examined the situation in a<br />

number of broad geographical regions in the decade from 1990 to 2000. The regions<br />

selected were USA, Jap<strong>an</strong>, the EU, South America (Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Colombia,<br />

Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela), South Africa (data for other countries in Sub-Sahar<strong>an</strong><br />

Africa were not available) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Pakist<strong>an</strong> (12-year data for India were not available).<br />

The third study examined the situation in the 15 countries which were member states<br />

of the EU from 1993 to 2002. Unless otherwise stated, reference to ‘<strong>Europe</strong>’ in this<br />

chapter is to the EU-15 data.<br />

The first study contained data on market size in US dollars at ex-m<strong>an</strong>ufacturers<br />

prices, adjusted according to the prevailing rates of exch<strong>an</strong>ge. The second contained<br />

detailed breakdowns by molecules of the volume of drugs prescribed. The third<br />

study provided country breakdowns of data for selected drug types in the countries of<br />

the EU.<br />

The principal comparative measure used is the SU. SUs are determined by taking the<br />

number of counting units sold, divided by the st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard unit factor which is the<br />

smallest common dose of a product form as defined by IMS Health. For example, for<br />

oral solid forms the st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard unit factor is one tablet or capsule whereas for syrup<br />

forms the st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard unit factor is one teaspoon (5 ml) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> injectable forms it is one<br />

ampoule or vial. This is the best available measure for comparative purposes, but it is<br />

far from perfect. For example, a 30-day pack of a product given four times a day will<br />

contribute 120 SUs for each pack sold whereas a similar pack of a once daily product<br />

will contribute only 30 SUs. M<strong>an</strong>y more products now have once daily dosing regimes<br />

th<strong>an</strong> in the past. In such circumst<strong>an</strong>ces SU <strong>an</strong>alyses c<strong>an</strong> make it appear that the<br />

market has collapsed even though the days of treatment will have remained const<strong>an</strong>t<br />

or increased. Therefore, there are some risks to using SUs for comparative purposes<br />

over the time periods <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the regions reported here, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> where these are of particular<br />

relev<strong>an</strong>ce we have tried to supplement SUs with other measures. Dates shown are<br />

calendar years. Prices refer to total sales ex-m<strong>an</strong>ufacturer (not retail prices) in US<br />

dollars at the exch<strong>an</strong>ge rate at the date in question. Figures credited to IMS Health are<br />

based on that report, but the <strong>an</strong>alysis, tables <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> figures are our own. Some drugs used<br />

to treat psychiatric conditions, such as the <strong>an</strong>ti-convuls<strong>an</strong>ts, are not included, as most<br />

prescriptions for such drugs are for non-psychiatric conditions.<br />

Wherever appropriate, the data is st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ardized to population size <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> expressed as<br />

SU per 1000 population in the year in question. 2001 population data was used in the<br />

calculations for the IMS Second Study, derived from the CIA World Factbook 2001, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

2003 population data was used for the IMS Second Study, derived from the CIA World<br />

Factbook 2003, available at www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/.<br />

2 IMS Health: First Study.<br />

3 The best historical work on the development of psychopharmacology has been done<br />

by David Healy, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> I draw extensively on this here: notably Healy (1997, 2001).<br />

4 Americ<strong>an</strong> Psychiatric Association (1994).<br />

5 Notably by Husseini M<strong>an</strong>ji <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> his team at the Laboratory of Molecular Pathophysiology<br />

at the US National Institute of <strong>Mental</strong> Health, e.g. M<strong>an</strong>ji et al. (2001).<br />

6 Notably Dum<strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> his team, e.g. Dum<strong>an</strong> et al. (1997, 2001).<br />

7 The DDD is the assumed average mainten<strong>an</strong>ce dose per day for a drug used for its<br />

main indication in adults, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> DDDs are assigned by the WHO Collaborating Centre<br />

for Drug Statistics Methodology in Norway (www.whocc.no/atcddd/).<br />

8 It is possible to calculate the conversion between SUs <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> DDDs, but this has to be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!