08.11.2014 Views

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Care of asylum seekers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> refugees 359<br />

Refugees in <strong>Europe</strong><br />

Refugees are thus a particular category of migr<strong>an</strong>ts, one occupying a specific<br />

political <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> legal position. A refugee is defined in Article 1 of the 1951 UN<br />

convention as <strong>an</strong>y person who:<br />

owing to a well founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of<br />

race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or<br />

political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is unable, or<br />

owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that<br />

country ...<br />

The immediate concern of those who drafted the Convention was the situation<br />

in <strong>Europe</strong> following the end of the Second World War <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the Convention<br />

originally only referred to those who became refugees ‘as a result of events<br />

occurring before 1 J<strong>an</strong>uary 1951’. However, this time limitation was removed<br />

in 1967 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the 1951 Convention <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the 1967 Protocol are still the most<br />

import<strong>an</strong>t, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the only universal, instruments of international refugee law.<br />

The fundamental challenge for those seeking refugee status is to demonstrate<br />

that they have a well-founded fear of persecution while receiving countries<br />

have their own systems of deciding whether a person fits the UN definition,<br />

<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> national courts may interpret the Convention differently. Some countries,<br />

for example, interpret the Convention as referring only to state persecution <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

do not accord refugee status to those suffering from persecution from non-state<br />

agencies. Other countries include both state <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> non-state persecution when<br />

considering the gr<strong>an</strong>ting of refugee status (Justice 2002).<br />

The term ‘refugee’ is often used in a generic sense to include both asylum<br />

seekers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> those who have achieved refugee status. It is also, on occasion,<br />

used to refer to ‘undocumented migr<strong>an</strong>ts’ who enter countries cl<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>estinely<br />

<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> do not actively seek asylum. Here the term will be used to include asylum<br />

seekers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> refugees except where specific issues relating to one or other category<br />

are addressed, in which case the more precise terminology will be used.<br />

Undocumented migr<strong>an</strong>ts occupy a quite different legal, political <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> social<br />

position. Their rights to welfare benefits, <strong>health</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> education may be signific<strong>an</strong>tly<br />

different to those of refugees <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> asylum seekers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> they may be<br />

largely ‘invisible’ to service providers. In short, with respect to mental <strong>health</strong><br />

care, being <strong>an</strong> asylum seeker or refugee will affect the context <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> content of<br />

the care provided <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> this may be signific<strong>an</strong>tly different in content <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> availability<br />

to that which undocumented migr<strong>an</strong>ts may have access to (PICUM<br />

2001).<br />

Despite this, there are import<strong>an</strong>t reasons for considering the position of<br />

undocumented migr<strong>an</strong>ts in <strong>an</strong> examination of the mental <strong>health</strong> care of<br />

refugees. Firstly, there is <strong>an</strong> interrelationship between asylum-seeking <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

undocumented migration. In m<strong>an</strong>y <strong>Europe</strong><strong>an</strong> countries with low numbers seeking<br />

asylum (for example, most of the countries in southern <strong>Europe</strong>), there is<br />

evidence of very high numbers of undocumented migr<strong>an</strong>ts. Bernal (2003: 85),<br />

for example, cites evidence of between 200,000 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 300,000 undocumented<br />

migr<strong>an</strong>ts in Spain while the number of asylum applications <strong>an</strong>nually since 1995<br />

never exceeded 10,000. In the years 2001 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 2002 Spain received 9200 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!