08.11.2014 Views

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Care of asylum seekers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> refugees 365<br />

the emergence of increasingly restrictive policies towards asylum seekers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

illegal immigr<strong>an</strong>ts in America, <strong>Europe</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Australasia. Measures have included<br />

confinement in detention centres, enforced dispersal in the community, the<br />

implementation of more stringent refugee determination procedures, increasingly<br />

severe restrictions on access to work, education <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> housing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> restrictions<br />

in access to <strong>health</strong> care (Silove et al. 2000b). Researchers have examined<br />

the relationship between factors relating to bureaucratic procedures, living conditions,<br />

low social support <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> discrimination in the post-migration environment<br />

<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> concluded that these c<strong>an</strong> have a signific<strong>an</strong>t impact on the increased<br />

risk of PTSD symptoms among traumatized asylum seekers (Silove et al. 1993).<br />

Increased levels of depression have been shown to be associated with low levels<br />

of social support <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fin<strong>an</strong>cial difficulties. On the basis of a study of 84 Iraqi<br />

refugees, Gorst-Unsworth <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Goldenberg conclude that, ‘Social factors in exile,<br />

particularly the level of “affective” social support, proved import<strong>an</strong>t in determining<br />

the severity of both post-traumatic stress disorder <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> depressive reactions,<br />

particularly when combined with a severe level of trauma/torture. Poor<br />

social support is a stronger predictor of depressive morbidity th<strong>an</strong> trauma<br />

factors’ (1998: 90). According to Silove et al., ‘salient ongoing stressors identified<br />

<strong>across</strong> several studies included delays in the processing of refugee applications,<br />

conflict with immigration officials, being denied a work permit, unemployment,<br />

separation from family, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> loneliness <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> boredom’ (2000b: 606).<br />

Internationally there has been a signific<strong>an</strong>t increase over the past decade in<br />

the detention of asylum seekers. A number of studies have been undertaken to<br />

examine the mental <strong>health</strong> implications of detention. Research in the United<br />

Kingdom indicated that psychological distress is evidenced through the high<br />

incidence of attempted suicide <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> hunger strikes (Pourgourides et al. 1996). As<br />

reported in research undertaken on 25 detained asylum seekers in Australia,<br />

there were higher rates of depression, suicidal ideation, post-traumatic stress,<br />

<strong>an</strong>xiety, p<strong>an</strong>ic <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> physical symptoms among the detained asylum seekers as<br />

compared to compatriot asylum seekers, refugees <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> immigr<strong>an</strong>ts living in the<br />

community (Thompson et al. 1988).<br />

What these studies indicate is the interrelationship between specific policies<br />

towards asylum seekers <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> refugees <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the mental <strong>health</strong> problems experienced<br />

by this group. Increasing restrictions on the facilities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> support offered<br />

to refugees <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the tightening of bureaucratic procedures may be signific<strong>an</strong>t<br />

‘stressors’ that are detrimental to mental <strong>health</strong>. A recently developing area of<br />

study has shifted the emphasis from a clinical focus on the impact of policies of<br />

deterrence on mental <strong>health</strong> status to a more sociological approach that examines<br />

the impact of ill <strong>health</strong>, including mental ill <strong>health</strong>, on the socio-legal<br />

contexts in which asylum applications are generated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> status is determined<br />

(Fassin 2001; Watters 2001a). This research is influenced by Zolberg’s seminal<br />

paper in which he directs attention to the impact of state immigration policies<br />

on patterns of migration <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> away from early neo-classical push/pull theories<br />

(Zolberg 1989).<br />

The routes taken by asylum applic<strong>an</strong>ts have been described as ‘avenues of<br />

access’ that are influenced by the prevailing immigration laws <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> policies<br />

(Watters 2001b). The ‘avenues’ followed by asylum seekers may be influenced by<br />

the extent to which they are experiencing <strong>health</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mental <strong>health</strong> problems

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!