08.11.2014 Views

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fin<strong>an</strong>cing <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> funding 61<br />

problems have multiple needs, often eliciting multiple responses from <strong>health</strong><br />

care <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other bodies, adding necessary complexity to these frameworks. We set<br />

them out in the following sections. We then pull out some key topics for more<br />

focused attention, starting with fin<strong>an</strong>cing arr<strong>an</strong>gements <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> mental <strong>health</strong><br />

budgets, then looking at the efficient <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> equitable targeting of resources, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

finally discussing resource challenges for mental <strong>health</strong> in <strong>Europe</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> how to<br />

overcome them.<br />

Production of welfare<br />

Descriptions of the resources available to a mental <strong>health</strong> system tend to focus<br />

primarily on those used in providing treatment of identified symptoms or<br />

needs. In fact, resources might be deployed in various ways:<br />

• promotion of well-being <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> prevention of symptoms;<br />

• screening for, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> assessment of, needs;<br />

• purchasing or providing treatment for identified needs;<br />

• mainten<strong>an</strong>ce of, or rehabilitation back into, ‘mainstream’ activities <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

lifestyles;<br />

• coordination of treatment <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> rehabilitation services (brokerage);<br />

• monitoring of service quality <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> service users’ outcomes;<br />

• regulation of procedures, services, choices <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> opportunities; <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

• research <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> development.<br />

What then do we me<strong>an</strong> by resources? How are they linked to outcomes?<br />

We c<strong>an</strong> start with a simple framework which represents the links between<br />

budgets, the resource inputs they purchase or fund, the services produced by<br />

those inputs, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the <strong>health</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> quality of life outcomes that hopefully will<br />

result for service users, their families <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> relev<strong>an</strong>t others. These are among the<br />

most pertinent links in <strong>an</strong>y mental <strong>health</strong> system <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the framework therefore<br />

helps us identify m<strong>an</strong>y of the issues faced by decision-makers.<br />

The framework is illustrated schematically in a highly simplified form in<br />

Figure 4.1 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> shows the connections between a number of entities:<br />

• The resource inputs used in promoting good mental <strong>health</strong> or in assessing,<br />

supporting, treating or monitoring people with mental <strong>health</strong> problems.<br />

These are mainly staff, physical capital, medications <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> other consumables.<br />

• The costs of these resource inputs expressed in monetary terms.<br />

• The service volumes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> qualities (perhaps weighted in some way for user<br />

characteristics, including casemix) produced from combinations of the<br />

resource inputs, which we c<strong>an</strong> call the intermediate outputs.<br />

• The final outcomes from prevention <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> care, principally outcomes for individual<br />

service users <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> others gauged in terms of symptom alleviation,<br />

improved functioning <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> quality of life, improved family well-being <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

perhaps some wider social consequences.<br />

• The non-resource inputs, which do not have a readily identified cost (since they<br />

are not directly marketed) but which exert influences on user outcomes <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

also mediate the influences of the resource inputs. Examples would be the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!