08.11.2014 Views

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

Mental health policy and practice across Europe: an overview

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mental</strong> <strong>health</strong> problems in primary care 219<br />

achieving those goals. The WHO suggests that all mental <strong>health</strong> policies are<br />

<strong>an</strong>chored by four guiding principles:<br />

1 Access: service provision should meet the need for services in the community.<br />

In addition, the right to obtain treatment should depend on the need for<br />

services, not ability to pay or geographic location. As outlined in Goldberg’s<br />

‘pathways to care’ model, there are problems in access to care in primary care,<br />

related to the fact that people do not consult as a consequence of stigma or<br />

inadequate knowledge, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> a signific<strong>an</strong>t proportion of disorders presenting in<br />

this setting are not recognized by the gatekeeping primary care clinici<strong>an</strong>.<br />

Patients failing to pass the first ‘filter to care’ are unable to access effective care<br />

from <strong>health</strong> services.<br />

2 Equity: mental <strong>health</strong> care resources should be distributed fairly <strong>across</strong> the<br />

population at large, so that patients with similar problems receive similar<br />

services (horizontal equity) <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> patients with more severe problems receive<br />

more care th<strong>an</strong> those with minor problems (vertical equity). There are two<br />

main sources of inequity in current services, which relate to the wide variation<br />

in the ability of individual practitioners to recognize disorders, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

inequity in the provision of specialist services within <strong>practice</strong>s. In addition,<br />

the inherent under-investment in mental <strong>health</strong> services <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> stigma that is<br />

associated with mental <strong>health</strong> problems me<strong>an</strong>s that allocation of resources is<br />

inequitable compared to other disease groups.<br />

3 Effectiveness: mental <strong>health</strong> services should do what they are intended to do:<br />

improve <strong>health</strong>. Health may be defined in terms of <strong>health</strong> status, or broader<br />

definitions may involve wider function <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> quality of life, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> not just the<br />

absence of disease (WHO 1948). Patient satisfaction with services is <strong>an</strong> additional,<br />

if somewhat more controversial, measure of effectiveness. Current<br />

m<strong>an</strong>agement of mental <strong>health</strong> problems c<strong>an</strong> involve the provision of ineffective<br />

treatments or those of unknown effectiveness (such as some forms of<br />

psychological therapy), or the ineffective delivery of effective treatments<br />

(such as inappropriate use of medication).<br />

4 Efficiency: given that resources for <strong>an</strong>y <strong>health</strong> care system are limited, they<br />

should be distributed in such a way as to maximize <strong>health</strong> gains to society.<br />

Clearly, the problems with access, equity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> effectiveness identified above<br />

limit the degree to which current services c<strong>an</strong> be efficient.<br />

The relationships between these different goals are complex, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> satisfying multiple<br />

criteria requires a population approach to pl<strong>an</strong>ning care, rather th<strong>an</strong> a<br />

focus on the particular patient which characterizes the philosophy of primary<br />

<strong>health</strong> care (Sibbald 1996; Katon et al. 1997).<br />

Models to improve mental <strong>health</strong> care in primary care settings<br />

Broadly, there are four main models available to improve mental <strong>health</strong> care in<br />

primary care (Bower <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Gilbody 2005), which are described below. Additional<br />

consideration should be given to the promotion of mental well-being <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the<br />

reduction of stigma associated with mental <strong>health</strong> problems is also import<strong>an</strong>t.<br />

<strong>Mental</strong> <strong>health</strong> promotion is considered in Chapter 8 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is not considered

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!