08.11.2014 Views

Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks for Lighting Energy ...

Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks for Lighting Energy ...

Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks for Lighting Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sensors. The research in [14] presents an example of extending the mote-FVF algorithm<br />

to applications on monitoring the structure health of space vehicles.<br />

10.1.3 Autonomous Sensing with Adaptive Rate<br />

The sensing rate adaptation algorithm employs prediction models to <strong>for</strong>ecast the<br />

next incoming sensor reading based on past readings <strong>and</strong> utilizes fuzzy logic to adapt<br />

the sensing rate to the change of the environment according to the prediction error. The<br />

algorithm serves as a useful mechanism when monitoring stimulus with changing<br />

dynamics, especially if sensing is an expensive action. In the lighting application with<br />

energy-constrained photosensors operating at an ultra-low duty cycle, bringing up the<br />

processor <strong>and</strong> data acquisition unit <strong>for</strong> sensing can sacrifice the life span of a sensor<br />

node. More importantly, since real time sensory feedback is critical <strong>for</strong> lighting control<br />

purposes, frequent power-hungry wireless communication is inevitable. The adaptive<br />

sensing strategy optimizes the timing <strong>for</strong> sensing <strong>and</strong> wireless communication, <strong>and</strong><br />

ensures the resolution of the sensed in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> good control per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Three different prediction models were evaluated <strong>for</strong> the algorithm, <strong>and</strong> all<br />

resulted in adequate prediction per<strong>for</strong>mance with minimal parameter tuning. The fuzzy<br />

rules efficiently adapted the sensing rate in response to the prediction errors to catch<br />

change in the stimulus. A test of daylight monitoring on a typical sunny day reveals that<br />

only less than 20% of the sensing action, <strong>and</strong> hence wireless communication, was<br />

required by adaptive sensing to catch all the daylight changing in<strong>for</strong>mation compared to<br />

that obtained with a fixed sensing rate at ten seconds per sample. The sensing rate was<br />

dynamically shifted between ten seconds <strong>and</strong> over five minutes per sample.<br />

191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!