08.11.2014 Views

Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks for Lighting Energy ...

Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks for Lighting Energy ...

Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks for Lighting Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In practice, fusion of sensor data could generate worse in<strong>for</strong>mation than that<br />

from a single robust, well-tasked <strong>and</strong> high fidelity sensor that directly measures the<br />

phenomenon of interest [70]. Poor in<strong>for</strong>mation results from the attempt to combine<br />

accurate data with biased or corrupted data, which closely resembles the Byzantine<br />

generals problem [71]. The problem discusses the dilemma a system may encounter<br />

when receiving conflicting in<strong>for</strong>mation from malfunctioning components through the<br />

metaphor of the Byzantine Army Generals camped with their troops preparing to attack<br />

an enemy city [72]. Communicating only by messengers, the generals must agree upon<br />

a common battle plan – to attack or to retreat, while one or more of them may be traitors<br />

trying to confuse others with false messages. It has been proven that an agreement<br />

among all generals can be reached if <strong>and</strong> only if more than two-thirds of the generals<br />

are loyal. In other words, two-thirds of the sensors must be well-functioning in order to<br />

produce a pertinent data by equally weighing <strong>and</strong> combining each sensor data through<br />

sensor fusion. Although one may prefer to gather in<strong>for</strong>mation from a single robust <strong>and</strong><br />

high fidelity sensor than per<strong>for</strong>m sensor fusion on multiple sensors, such a sensor could<br />

be unaf<strong>for</strong>dable or may not even exist, or the phenomenon of interest is not directly<br />

measurable in reality.<br />

Popular techniques that have been applied to sensor fusion applications include,<br />

but are not limited to Kalman filters, probabilistic data association filters (PADF),<br />

hidden Markov models (HMM), maximum likelihood, fuzzy logic, neural networks,<br />

Dempster-Shafer theory, etc. Hybrids of the sensor fusion methods have also been<br />

implemented in some complex applications. Alag et al. developed a methodology <strong>for</strong><br />

sensor validation, fusion, <strong>and</strong> fault detection <strong>for</strong> equipment monitoring <strong>and</strong> diagnostics<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!