15.11.2014 Views

ssc-367 - Ship Structure Committee

ssc-367 - Ship Structure Committee

ssc-367 - Ship Structure Committee

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

life. During the comprehensive design the best parameter to<br />

increase is brace thickness while keeping t/T constant.<br />

Further improvementsin fatiguelivesmaybe obtained by determining<br />

the SCF through the use of finite elements analysis or models<br />

tests. Another alternative to lower the SCF is to stiffen the<br />

joints with rings and thus reduce the SCFS to the lower bound<br />

values. However, considering the increased fabrication costs of<br />

stiffened joints, the use of rings should be considered the least<br />

desirable option to lower the SCFS and improve the fatigue lives.<br />

The validity of SCF equations and their sensitivities to various<br />

geometric parameters are illustrated in Appendix C. It is<br />

recommended that the tables and figures provided are studied to<br />

determine an acceptable approach compatible with the specific<br />

problem on hand. A finite element study results are also included<br />

in Appendix C to illustratethe range of SCFS for a typical complex<br />

joint. Since empirical equations are applicable for only simple<br />

joints, a FEA is recommended for determination of complex joint<br />

SCFS.<br />

5-34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!