15.11.2014 Views

ssc-367 - Ship Structure Committee

ssc-367 - Ship Structure Committee

ssc-367 - Ship Structure Committee

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Weibull AtIDroach<br />

The Weibull shape factor is a stress range distribution<br />

parameter. The Weibull shape factor used with the<br />

characteristicstress range allows carrying out of a fatigue<br />

analyses with a relatively<br />

Since the Weibull approach<br />

few structural analysis cases.<br />

differs from detailed spectral<br />

fatigueanalysisonly in how the stressrange is obtained,the<br />

accuracyof fatigue lives obtainedwith this approach largely<br />

depends on the validity of Weibull shape factor.<br />

The Weibull shape factor may vary between 0.8 and 1.2. If<br />

information on structure and route characteristics are not<br />

available, a shape factor of 1.0 may be used. Shape factors<br />

obtained by calibrating the characteristic stress range<br />

against a spectral fatigue approach indicate that single most<br />

important variable affecting the shape factor is the<br />

environment. In severe North Atlantic and Pacific wave<br />

loadings,the shape factoris higher;the shape factoris also<br />

generally lower for those ship structures with longer hulls.<br />

Although the shape factor may be somewhat different for<br />

differentparts of the structure (i.e. bulkheads, bottom) and<br />

itmay also depend on the number of cycles to failure, further<br />

work is necessary to document those effects.<br />

Fixed and Mobile Marine <strong>Structure</strong>s<br />

The structures referred to in this section are both floating and<br />

bottom-supported steel structures. Most organizations that issue<br />

recommendations, rules, regulations and codes distinguish between<br />

floating and fixed structures because of the differences in their<br />

configurations and the resulting differences in applied loads,<br />

structureresponse,redundancyand accessibilityfor inspectionand<br />

repairs. The requirements vary substantially in scope and detail<br />

from one document to another, but efforts to provide consistent yet<br />

flexible fatigue analysis requirements have been successful.<br />

4-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!