June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH 105 D.65 (Poster) Pharmacokinetic assessment <strong>of</strong> LPV/r (Kaletra ® ) in children younger than 24 months reveals extremely low plasma concentrations Königs C. 1 , Dunsch D. 1 , Scheuplein M. 1 , Kurowski C. 2 , Linde R. 1 , Kreuz W. 1 , von Hentig N. 3 1 JW Goethe University, Department for Pediatrics, Hemostasis and Immundeficiency Treatment and <strong>Research</strong> Unit, Frankfurt, Germany, 2 HIV Lab, Berlin, Germany, 3 JW Goethe University, Department for Pharmacology, Frankfurt, Germany Antiretroviral drugs <strong>of</strong>fer a range <strong>of</strong> therapies for HIV-1-infected individuals. Treating HIV-positive children remains challenging. Only a few drugs are available in adequate formulations. Pediatric guidelines and dosage recommendations are partly based on data from adult trials. Very limited data is available on children younger than 2 yrs, who need to start antiretroviral therapy (ART). Eight children 1.000.000 cps/ml at baseline. 5/8 children reached VL <strong>of</strong>
106 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH June 27, 2007 Kaever, V. (2005) Quantification <strong>of</strong> antiretroviral drugs in dried blood spot samples by means <strong>of</strong> liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 19, 2995– 3001 D.68 (Vortrag) Antiretroviral therapy <strong>of</strong> patients infected with drug-resistant HIV-strains: Analysis <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the first-line regimen in patients with a documented date <strong>of</strong> HIV-infection in Germany Poggensee G. 1 , Kücherer C. 2 , Werning J. 1 , Bartmeyer B. 1 , Fleischhauer C. 1 , Braun P. 3 , Cordes C. 4 , Jessen H. 4 , Klausen G. 4 , Schewe K. 5 , Stoll M. 6 , vanLunzen J. 7 , Hamouda O. 8 1 Robert Koch-Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Infectious Disease and Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany, 2 Robert Koch-Institute, HIV- Variability and Molecular Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany, 3 private practitioner, Aachen, Germany, 4 private practitioner, Berlin, Germany, 5 private practitioner, Hamburg, Germany, 6 Hannover <strong>Medical</strong> School, Internal Medicine, Hannover, Germany, 7 University Clinic Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, 8 Robert Koch-Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Infectious Disease and Epidemiology and the German Seroconverter Study Group, Berlin, Germany Objectives: Studies <strong>of</strong> the first-line regimen in patients with transmitted drug resistance are limited. Aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate the influence <strong>of</strong> genotypic resistance test results on the choice <strong>of</strong> first-line treatment in patients with a documented date <strong>of</strong> HIV-infection with transmitted drug-resistance. Methods: Genotypic resistance testing was performed in all drug-naïve patients <strong>of</strong> the HIV-seroconverter cohort. Data acquisition took place between 1998 and 2005. Start <strong>of</strong> antiretroviral therapy and drug composition <strong>of</strong> firstline treatment were assessed. Proportions were given with interquartile ranges. Mantel-Haenzels X2test and Fisher’s exact test were used. Viral loads and CD4 counts were compared by the Kruskall-Wallis test. p-values were two sided and p-values <strong>of</strong> < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: Of 922 tested patients drug resistant HIV was identified in 130 patients. Susceptible strains were found in 792 individuals. Any NRTI resistant HIV was found in 25 individuals (25/35). NRTI resistance alone was detected in 21 patients (21/35). Combinations <strong>of</strong> NRTI with PI and/or NNRTI resistance were found in 4 patients (4/25). PI or NNRTI resistance alone was assessed in 5 (5/35) and 4 (4/35) patients, respectively. The remaining 5 patients showed different combinations <strong>of</strong> multi-drug resistance. Antiretroviral therapy was prescribed for 35 patients (35/130) with predicted drug resistant HIV. Treatment regimen <strong>of</strong> 25 patients (25/35) included at least one inactive drug. One inactive drug was included in the regimen <strong>of</strong> 17 individuals. The regimen <strong>of</strong> 5 patients comprised 2 inactive drugs. In 3 patients no active drug was included in the first-line regimen. The majority <strong>of</strong> mutations conferred AZT-resistance (11/35). Since 2002 72% <strong>of</strong> first-line treatments included AZT (p=0.011). Since 2003 no PI or NNRTI were included in first-line treatments <strong>of</strong> patients with predicted PI/NNRTI resistance. AZT was not included in the regimen <strong>of</strong> three patients who were infected with highly AZT-resistant HIV. CD4-cell counts and viral load did not differ between individuals treated with or without compromised drugs. Conclusions: More recently a trend to omit compromised PI and NNRTI drugs appeared. Supported by BMG, BMBF/Competence Network HIV/<strong>AIDS</strong> D.69 (Poster) Ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir dramatically increased tacrolimus drug concentrations in an HIV/HCV-infected patient with liver transplantation Schulbin H. 1 , Masuhr A. 1 , Stocker H. 1 , Müller M. 1 , Broelsch C. 2 , Beckebaum S. 2 , Cicinnati V. 2 , Arasteh K. 1 1 Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria Klinikum, Berlin, Germany, 2 Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany Introduction: Drug drug interactions with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI) are increasingly troublesome, as HIVinfected patients require treatment for other conditions than HIV. Methods: We describe the case <strong>of</strong> an HIV/HCV co-infected patient who initiated the immunosuppressant tacrolimus following liver transplantation. Results: The 36 year old male with HIV/HCV-coinfection underwent liver transplantation in December 2005 for chronic liver failure. Along with his stable antiretroviral therapy consisting <strong>of</strong> fosamprenavir/ritonavir 700/100 mg, twice daily and c<strong>of</strong>ormulated ten<strong>of</strong>ovir/emtricitabine he was started on tacrolimus 5 mg, twice daily. 5 Days after the start <strong>of</strong> this treatment the serum tacrolimus concentration was 65,4 ng/mL, which is more than six times the desired value <strong>of</strong> 10 ng/ml. Only after the dosage was reduced to 0,25 mg q 3 days stable drug trough concentrations within the required concentration range could be achieved. Serum amprenavir concentrations were also monitored but were within the normal range as compared to historical controls. Conclusions: Enhanced tacrolimus exposure in patients receiving c<strong>of</strong>ormulated lopinavir ritonavir has been described before. However, no prospective controlled pharmacokinetic studies have been performed. This is the first report on an interaction between ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir and tacrolimus. As the numbers <strong>of</strong> HIV-infected patients with solid organ transplantation will rise clinicians must be increasingly aware <strong>of</strong> potential drug interactions with PI and immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus. D.70 (Poster) Low dose Prednisolone helps to delay HAART initiation Ulmer A. 1 , Müller M. 1 , Stützer H. 2 , Frietsch B. 1 1 Praxis Ulmer Frietsch Müller, Stuttgart, Germany, 2 University <strong>of</strong> Cologne, IMSIE - Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> Statistics, Köln, Germany Objective: HAART is the best and almost the only established treatment option for HIV infected individuals. But it is expensive and complicated, leading to limited access in developing countries with dramatic consequences, connected with side effects and potential resistances. An important issue is to find additional or alternative therapeutic options and to increase the independence <strong>of</strong> HAART. The study groups <strong>of</strong> Andrieu and ourselves have already published a CD4-stabilizing effect <strong>of</strong> Prednisolone. The number <strong>of</strong> patients and the time <strong>of</strong>
- Page 1 and 2:
European Journal of Medical Researc
- Page 3 and 4:
Instructions to Authors 1. The Euro
- Page 6 and 7:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 8 and 9:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 10 and 11:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 12 and 13:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 14 and 15:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 16 and 17:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 18 and 19:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 20 and 21:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 22 and 23:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 24 and 25:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 26 and 27:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 28 and 29:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 30 and 31:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 32 and 33:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 34 and 35:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 36 and 37:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 38 and 39:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 40 and 41:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 42 and 43:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 44 and 45:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 46 and 47:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 48 and 49:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 50 and 51:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 52 and 53:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 54 and 55:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 56 and 57:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 58 and 59:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 60 and 61:
June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 62 and 63: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 64 and 65: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 66 and 67: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 68 and 69: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 70 and 71: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 72 and 73: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 74 and 75: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 76 and 77: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 78 and 79: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 80 and 81: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 82 and 83: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 84 and 85: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 86 and 87: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 88 and 89: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 90 and 91: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 92 and 93: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 94 and 95: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 96 and 97: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 98 and 99: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 100 and 101: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 102 and 103: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 104 and 105: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 106 and 107: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 108 and 109: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 110 and 111: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 114 and 115: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 116 and 117: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 118 and 119: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 120 and 121: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 122 and 123: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 124 and 125: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 126 and 127: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 128 and 129: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 130 and 131: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 132 and 133: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 134 and 135: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 136 and 137: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 138 and 139: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 140 and 141: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M
- Page 142 and 143: June 27, 2007 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF M