16.11.2014 Views

European Journal of Medical Research - Deutsche AIDS ...

European Journal of Medical Research - Deutsche AIDS ...

European Journal of Medical Research - Deutsche AIDS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH<br />

June 27, 2007<br />

Methods: Over the time course, LPV-plasma-levels in consecutive<br />

patients with chronic liver disease (n=30) and consecutive<br />

patients without liver disease (n=38) were evaluated.<br />

LPV-plasma-levels were determined with a HPLC-based<br />

method. CD4-cell count and HI-viral load were also correlated<br />

with liver disease. Statistical analysis was done by multivariate<br />

analysis using the SPSS S<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

Results: The LPV plasma-levels <strong>of</strong> n=450 samples from 30<br />

patients with liver disease (Hepatitis B: n=17, Hepatitis C:<br />

n=16, Alcoholic liver disease: n=7) were determined over<br />

18.7±16,3 months (1 - 48.5 months). A median <strong>of</strong> 10 samples<br />

per patient was eligible (2 - 50 samples). All patients received<br />

400 mg LPV bid with various nuke-back-bones. There were<br />

no significant differences according to liver disease in LPVplasma<br />

levels (mean Ctrough without: 5.917±4.811 ng/ml,<br />

mean Ctrough with liver-disease: 6.564±4.517 ng/ml, p ><br />

0.05). The intraindividual and interindividual variation <strong>of</strong><br />

LPV-plasma levels, CD-4 increase, and HI-virus suppression<br />

in patients with and without liver disease were comparable.<br />

Conclusion: In this clinical setting no differences in LPVplasma<br />

levels between patients with and without chronic liver<br />

disease could be demonstrated. LPV-therapy in patients with<br />

chronic liver disease is safe. TDM is a helpful tool in patients<br />

with impaired liver function for dose adjustment.<br />

D.78 (Poster)<br />

A weight adapted nelfinavir (NFV) containing<br />

ART may decrease pill-burden<br />

Winzer R. 1 , Hillenbrand H. 2 , Galle P.R. 1 , Löhr H. 3 ,<br />

Böcher W. 1<br />

1 I. Medizinische Klinik der Universität Mainz, Mainz,<br />

Germany, 2 Schwerpunktpraxis, Berlin, Germany, 3 Praxis für<br />

Gastroenterologie, Wiesbaden, Germany<br />

Background: ART consisting <strong>of</strong> 2 NRTI + PI or NNRTI is<br />

standard today. Most antiretroviral drugs are dosed without<br />

consideration <strong>of</strong> individual patients weight. However, weight<br />

based dosing might reduce pill burden and increase treatment<br />

adherence, an important factor <strong>of</strong> treatment response.Thus,<br />

we compared a weight adapted NFV containing therapy<br />

(25mg/kg/d) with one with standard dosage (2500mg/d) in respect<br />

to pharmacokinetic, virological and immunological parameters.<br />

Method: In this prospective, open-label monocenter trial over<br />

48 weeks, patients on stable NFV containing ART<br />

(>3months) were sex and weight-related randomised either to<br />

a weight adapted (group A: 25mg/kg/d, n=14) or standard<br />

dosage (group B: 2500mg/d, n=14) NFV containing ART in<br />

combination with 2 NRTIs. Pharmacokinetic examinations<br />

were carried out at baseline, week 4 and week 12, virological<br />

and immunological parameters were done every 3 months.<br />

Data were analysed with Kruskal-Wallis test.<br />

Results: In total, 28 patients (m/f: 17/11; average age:<br />

43±9years) were randomised; 23 patients reached week 48<br />

(one screening-failure, one lost to-follow up at week 24, one<br />

virological therapy failure at week 36, two study unrelated<br />

deaths after week 36). Even though both groups were well<br />

matched regarding their body-mass-index (A: 22.83 ±<br />

4.09kg/m 2 , B: 23.95 ± 3.49kg/m 2 ) there were no significant<br />

differences concerning most pharmacokinetic parameters<br />

(Ctroughbaseline: 1540./.820ng/ml, p1-<br />

log-raise) week 48, B: one virological failure week 36) and<br />

immunological treatment responses (CD4-increaseweek48:<br />

30./.56cells/; p = 1.0) did not differ between both groups, although<br />

the administered NFV dosages and pill burden were<br />

significantly reduced in treatment group A (A: 24.05 ±<br />

2.12mg/kg/d, B: 36.16 ± 8.58mg/kg/d; p = 0.001).<br />

Summary: In this study, there were no significant differences<br />

in the treatment response to weight adapted (25mg/kg/d) or<br />

standard dosage (2500mg/d) NFV containing antiretroviral<br />

therapy. Thus, a reduction <strong>of</strong> pill burden and treatment adherence<br />

seems reasonable under the conditions <strong>of</strong> therapeutical<br />

drug monitoring.<br />

D.79 (Poster)<br />

Anticonvulsants in patients on antiretroviral<br />

therapy: Case report and literature review<br />

Thaler J. 1 , Emmelkamp J. 1 , Bode J. 1 , Oette M. 1 ,<br />

Strzelczyk A. 2<br />

1 Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Hepatologie,<br />

Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Düsseldorf, Germany,<br />

2 Universität Marburg, Neurologie, Marburg, Germany<br />

Objective: To give an overview on published literature on the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> anticonvulsants in patients on antiretroviral therapy and<br />

to provide recommendations on their concurrent use.<br />

Background: In patients with HIV infection seizures are a<br />

relatively common occurrence. Seizures may be a result <strong>of</strong><br />

HIV infection <strong>of</strong> the CNS, a manifestation <strong>of</strong> an opportunistic<br />

infection or a result <strong>of</strong> mass lesions. As they are likely to recur<br />

in HIV-seropositive patients anticonvulsive treatment is<br />

generally advisable for a first seizure without a recognisable<br />

and reversible cause.<br />

For the clinicians caring for HIV-seropositive patients anticonvulsants<br />

and antiretrovirals impose therapeutic dilemmas<br />

as they may interact through multiple mechanisms including<br />

enhanced or inhibited liver metabolism, competition for protein<br />

binding and increased viral replication.<br />

Case report: A 40 year-old patient with HIV Infection presented<br />

with a first seizure due to a primary CNS lymphoma.<br />

As the patient was under HAART, carbamazepine could not<br />

be adminstered because <strong>of</strong> significant pharmacological interactions.<br />

As with use <strong>of</strong> valproic acid a seizure control could<br />

not be obtained, levetiracetam was introduced because <strong>of</strong> little<br />

or no known interaction with HAART but had to be removed<br />

because <strong>of</strong> a disabling tremor. Finally the introduction <strong>of</strong> lamotrigine<br />

was well tolerated and lead to seizure control.<br />

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to<br />

identify literature on the concurrent use <strong>of</strong> anticonvulsants<br />

and antiretrovirals. Using a standardized assessment form, information<br />

was extracted from each publication and systematically<br />

reported.<br />

Results and conclusions: There is only limited data available<br />

regarding interactions for the use <strong>of</strong> anticonvulsants in patients<br />

on antiretroviral therapy resulting in an urgent need for<br />

controlled trials examining pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic<br />

interactions between anticonvulsants and antiretrovirals.<br />

Valproic acid and newer anticonvulsants including<br />

gabapentine, lamotrigine and levetiracetam may be considered<br />

<strong>of</strong> reasonable choice compared to first-generation agents.<br />

However, close monitoring for anticonvulsant-antiretroviral<br />

interactions is advisable because <strong>of</strong> the potential for toxicity,<br />

poor seizure control and incomplete viral suppression.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!