17.11.2014 Views

I. VAMA MARGA Foundations Of The Left-Hand Path - staticfly.net

I. VAMA MARGA Foundations Of The Left-Hand Path - staticfly.net

I. VAMA MARGA Foundations Of The Left-Hand Path - staticfly.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

scandalous, often impossible behavior to be in keeping with the Sufi practice<br />

of malamat (being blameworthy), in which the initiate adopts a mode of<br />

conduct that consciously alienates those around him, ruining the good<br />

reputation strived for by conventional citizens. <strong>The</strong> practice of malamat<br />

might very well have been learned by the young Gurdjieff through an<br />

encounter with the Malamti Sufi Order, an initiatory body founded in the<br />

eighth century that has exercised a powerful underground influence upon the<br />

magical tradition.<br />

Such systematic ruination of one's standing in society is of course<br />

also a standard practice of advanced left-hand path adepts, whose god-like<br />

contempt for the slave values of the pashu manifest in extreme rejection of<br />

all of the props of mass-approved comportment. If Gurdjieff did not go quite<br />

as far as the Aghori in this radical detachment from that being he disdainfully<br />

referred to as "the normal man", his actions seem to have served the same<br />

initiatory purposes, for him, and for those willing victims he entangled in his<br />

teaching.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is one frequently ignored detail in Gurdjieff's life that places<br />

his often puzzling behavior in an illuminating context. It seems fairly certain<br />

that Gurdjieff's own restless trek through Tibet and possible contact to the<br />

court of the Dalai Lama was made whilst in the service of the Tsarist<br />

intelligence service. lie seems to have carried out this assignment under the<br />

convenient guise of a spiritual seeker, and may well have continued his<br />

intelligence work for other nations after the Bolshevik revolution.<br />

Gurdjieff's withering contempt for politics, patriotism and government<br />

policy of any kind – which often dismayed his more idealistic disciples –<br />

was surely as informed by his experience as an undercover operative who<br />

had been privy to the behind-the-scenes operations of the world, as by any<br />

metaphysical understanding. Thus Gurdjieff could assume the seemingly<br />

contradictory roles of Tsarist spy and minor Nazi collaborator, among many<br />

others, with little hand-wringing over conventional ethics.<br />

Was this stance simply Gurdjieff's mystical rationalization for<br />

indulging a generally roguish character? lie never explained directly, but his<br />

life-long pattern of creating elaborate initiatory crises and traumas for his<br />

disciples, sexual or otherwise, thus forcing them to think for themselves or<br />

fail in the attempt, seems clear enough. Although it can be argued that<br />

223<br />

Crowley's similar courting of scandal and public infamy may have served<br />

the same purpose, one gets the impression that Gurdjieff was much more<br />

controlled and premeditated in applying this strategy. Like the medieval lefthand<br />

path Master Drugpa Kunley, Gurdjieff sought to awaken his pupils<br />

through shock treatment, disillusioning them as harshly as possible.<br />

Gurdjieff biographer James Webb describes the one recorded<br />

meeting of Gurdjieff and Crowley; based on what he claims are first-hand<br />

reports. (Lawrence Sutin, in his Do What Thou Wilt: A Life <strong>Of</strong> Aleister<br />

Crowley casts some doubt on this account.) If the encounter occurred as<br />

described, it can be interpreted as meaning that either Gurdjieff sensed an<br />

essential hollowness at the core of Crowley's persona, or merely felt that he<br />

had to place any likely competitor in the Western guru game in his place.<br />

After Crowley spent a fairly innocuous weekend at Gurdjieff's Institute for<br />

the Harmonious Development of Man in Fountainbleau, Gurdjieff allegedly<br />

turned upon his infamous guest and treated him to a furious public<br />

denunciation. "You are filthy, all dirty inside. You never come in my house<br />

again!", Gurdjieff shouted at the Great Beast 666, whom according to some<br />

eyewitnesses at the meeting of mages, skulked off in a rare state of<br />

embarrassment. Considering that Gurdjieff declared that one of his missions<br />

in the West was the eradication of occultism and the delusions it excites, it<br />

may be that he saw the arch-occultist Crowley as a prime target.<br />

Gurdjieff's system grants none of the special importance to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!