I. VAMA MARGA Foundations Of The Left-Hand Path - staticfly.net
I. VAMA MARGA Foundations Of The Left-Hand Path - staticfly.net
I. VAMA MARGA Foundations Of The Left-Hand Path - staticfly.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
scandalous, often impossible behavior to be in keeping with the Sufi practice<br />
of malamat (being blameworthy), in which the initiate adopts a mode of<br />
conduct that consciously alienates those around him, ruining the good<br />
reputation strived for by conventional citizens. <strong>The</strong> practice of malamat<br />
might very well have been learned by the young Gurdjieff through an<br />
encounter with the Malamti Sufi Order, an initiatory body founded in the<br />
eighth century that has exercised a powerful underground influence upon the<br />
magical tradition.<br />
Such systematic ruination of one's standing in society is of course<br />
also a standard practice of advanced left-hand path adepts, whose god-like<br />
contempt for the slave values of the pashu manifest in extreme rejection of<br />
all of the props of mass-approved comportment. If Gurdjieff did not go quite<br />
as far as the Aghori in this radical detachment from that being he disdainfully<br />
referred to as "the normal man", his actions seem to have served the same<br />
initiatory purposes, for him, and for those willing victims he entangled in his<br />
teaching.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is one frequently ignored detail in Gurdjieff's life that places<br />
his often puzzling behavior in an illuminating context. It seems fairly certain<br />
that Gurdjieff's own restless trek through Tibet and possible contact to the<br />
court of the Dalai Lama was made whilst in the service of the Tsarist<br />
intelligence service. lie seems to have carried out this assignment under the<br />
convenient guise of a spiritual seeker, and may well have continued his<br />
intelligence work for other nations after the Bolshevik revolution.<br />
Gurdjieff's withering contempt for politics, patriotism and government<br />
policy of any kind – which often dismayed his more idealistic disciples –<br />
was surely as informed by his experience as an undercover operative who<br />
had been privy to the behind-the-scenes operations of the world, as by any<br />
metaphysical understanding. Thus Gurdjieff could assume the seemingly<br />
contradictory roles of Tsarist spy and minor Nazi collaborator, among many<br />
others, with little hand-wringing over conventional ethics.<br />
Was this stance simply Gurdjieff's mystical rationalization for<br />
indulging a generally roguish character? lie never explained directly, but his<br />
life-long pattern of creating elaborate initiatory crises and traumas for his<br />
disciples, sexual or otherwise, thus forcing them to think for themselves or<br />
fail in the attempt, seems clear enough. Although it can be argued that<br />
223<br />
Crowley's similar courting of scandal and public infamy may have served<br />
the same purpose, one gets the impression that Gurdjieff was much more<br />
controlled and premeditated in applying this strategy. Like the medieval lefthand<br />
path Master Drugpa Kunley, Gurdjieff sought to awaken his pupils<br />
through shock treatment, disillusioning them as harshly as possible.<br />
Gurdjieff biographer James Webb describes the one recorded<br />
meeting of Gurdjieff and Crowley; based on what he claims are first-hand<br />
reports. (Lawrence Sutin, in his Do What Thou Wilt: A Life <strong>Of</strong> Aleister<br />
Crowley casts some doubt on this account.) If the encounter occurred as<br />
described, it can be interpreted as meaning that either Gurdjieff sensed an<br />
essential hollowness at the core of Crowley's persona, or merely felt that he<br />
had to place any likely competitor in the Western guru game in his place.<br />
After Crowley spent a fairly innocuous weekend at Gurdjieff's Institute for<br />
the Harmonious Development of Man in Fountainbleau, Gurdjieff allegedly<br />
turned upon his infamous guest and treated him to a furious public<br />
denunciation. "You are filthy, all dirty inside. You never come in my house<br />
again!", Gurdjieff shouted at the Great Beast 666, whom according to some<br />
eyewitnesses at the meeting of mages, skulked off in a rare state of<br />
embarrassment. Considering that Gurdjieff declared that one of his missions<br />
in the West was the eradication of occultism and the delusions it excites, it<br />
may be that he saw the arch-occultist Crowley as a prime target.<br />
Gurdjieff's system grants none of the special importance to the