21.11.2014 Views

Study on non-legislative initiatives for companies to promote gender ...

Study on non-legislative initiatives for companies to promote gender ...

Study on non-legislative initiatives for companies to promote gender ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Gender equality <strong>initiatives</strong> 137<br />

What are the<br />

main<br />

advantages of<br />

the specific type<br />

of initiative?<br />

What are the<br />

main<br />

disadvantages<br />

of the specific<br />

type of<br />

initiative?<br />

When is the<br />

measure most<br />

appropriate?<br />

Label Prize/award Charter Ranking/Index<br />

Clear requirements<br />

(standards)<br />

External evaluati<strong>on</strong><br />

whether requirements<br />

are met<br />

Aims at organisati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

change and implies<br />

further development<br />

Equality plans are<br />

implemented<br />

Requires initiative of<br />

enterprises<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sultancy entails<br />

often costs<br />

Rather time c<strong>on</strong>suming<br />

For enterprises willing <strong>to</strong><br />

sustainably implement<br />

<strong>gender</strong> equality<br />

throughout the whole<br />

organisati<strong>on</strong><br />

Very good instrument <strong>for</strong><br />

public relati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Recogniti<strong>on</strong> <strong>for</strong> already<br />

implemented measures<br />

Very popular <strong>to</strong>ol <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>promote</strong> <strong>gender</strong> equality<br />

in the media<br />

Analysis of a given<br />

moment in time<br />

Processes are not<br />

assessed, <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>for</strong>mer<br />

developments and plans<br />

<strong>for</strong> the future<br />

Only limited number of<br />

winners<br />

It is a good “starter drug”<br />

as the enterprise does not<br />

risk anything when<br />

participating<br />

As an add-<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> recognize<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts of enterprises<br />

active in other types of<br />

<strong>initiatives</strong><br />

ideally based <strong>on</strong> selfinitiative<br />

and str<strong>on</strong>g<br />

commitment of the<br />

enterprise<br />

signing a charter as a<br />

missi<strong>on</strong>ary act <strong>to</strong> motivate<br />

other enterprises <strong>to</strong> follow<br />

instrument <strong>to</strong> support societal<br />

developments which<br />

seem <strong>to</strong> be favourable <strong>to</strong><br />

the enterprise<br />

as the charter relies more<br />

<strong>on</strong> self-commitment than<br />

<strong>on</strong> external assessment<br />

there is the danger of<br />

using it as a mere lip<br />

service<br />

probably reflects public<br />

goals <strong>to</strong> a lesser extent, as<br />

often based <strong>on</strong> the<br />

<strong>companies</strong>’ <strong>initiatives</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

For self-initiative enterprises<br />

which want <strong>to</strong><br />

support societal<br />

developments<br />

For enterprises which<br />

want <strong>to</strong> <strong>promote</strong> their<br />

activities (hybrid between<br />

n<strong>on</strong>-<strong>legislative</strong> initiative<br />

and initiative individually<br />

taken by <strong>companies</strong>)<br />

Most neutral instrument<br />

based mainly <strong>on</strong><br />

quantitative data<br />

Shows also bad<br />

practices (the worst<br />

ranked enterprises)<br />

often based <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong><br />

externally available and<br />

quantitative data<br />

Lack of in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong><br />

processes and<br />

developments<br />

Does not directly<br />

support any selfinitiative<br />

of enterprises<br />

As additi<strong>on</strong>al <strong>to</strong>ol <strong>to</strong><br />

illustrate the level of<br />

<strong>gender</strong> equality am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

a certain type of<br />

enterprises<br />

As m<strong>on</strong>i<strong>to</strong>ring<br />

instrument<br />

Compendium of<br />

good practice<br />

Low-threshold<br />

initiative, as rather<br />

based <strong>on</strong> a<br />

descripti<strong>on</strong> than <strong>on</strong><br />

a <strong>for</strong>malised<br />

assessment<br />

Only as additi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

measure<br />

No “critical”<br />

assessment<br />

Supporting<br />

measure<br />

To illustrate the<br />

practice of <strong>gender</strong><br />

equality measures<br />

1<br />

Here <strong>on</strong>ly benefits are menti<strong>on</strong>ed which are especially true <strong>for</strong> the specific type of initiative in comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> the other types. For more in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

c<strong>on</strong>cerning the benefits in general see chapter 4.3<br />

Source: Austrian Institute <strong>for</strong> SME Research

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!