Sorority Rituals - Reflections On Rites of ... - Mari Ann Callais
Sorority Rituals - Reflections On Rites of ... - Mari Ann Callais
Sorority Rituals - Reflections On Rites of ... - Mari Ann Callais
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Gradually, however, they took over public functions, and, to varying extents, became<br />
influential forces on many campuses. Thus, at California, Berkeley, where college<br />
housing was almost nonexistent, the sororities functioned as select dormitories. In<br />
addition, especially at coeducational schools, they provided institutional group support<br />
for young women. Administrators, early wary <strong>of</strong> the political power <strong>of</strong> these societies as a<br />
competing authority, at first tried to halt their development. In time, though, they found it<br />
useful to enlist sorority leaders along with those <strong>of</strong> student government, to control social<br />
behavior on campus. Some schools, like Stanford, Chicago, and California, did not permit<br />
students to start a chapter unless their grades were required to indicate their intended<br />
plans and activities. Sororities gained status from overseeing the members and helping<br />
them maintain good grades (p. 107).<br />
In addition, Solomon (1985) writes <strong>of</strong> the opposition to sororities in the following:<br />
Some educators and students opposed sororities because their presence promoted<br />
exclusivity. Membership in sororities was based, not only on personal congeniality, but<br />
on the individual’s ability to share expenses as well. Students outside sororities<br />
contributed to perpetuating them by too <strong>of</strong>ten believing that they were being left out <strong>of</strong><br />
something valuable (p. 107).<br />
These descriptions place into context the changing environment in which sororities began on<br />
college campuses and the mixed feelings concerning their contribution to the campus<br />
environment.<br />
The history <strong>of</strong> the sorority movement demonstrates the sorority movement's relationship<br />
to women's participation in higher education. In the sorority world, the timeline <strong>of</strong> these<br />
organizations' founding is very significant. Each group was founded based upon the needs <strong>of</strong><br />
their founders. The age <strong>of</strong> the founders, the geographical location <strong>of</strong> the institution where they<br />
were founded, and even the religious beliefs <strong>of</strong> their founders played a significant role in each<br />
sorority's purpose.<br />
The first recorded founding <strong>of</strong> a women’s society is Alpha Delta Pi Fraternity, which was<br />
founded as the Adelphean Society in 1851 at Wesleyan College. Alpha Delta Pi was followed by<br />
Phi Mu Fraternity, which was founded as the Philamathian Society at Wesleyan College in 1852.<br />
The two organizations were referred to as secret societies. Pi Beta Phi came into being in 1867 as<br />
31