23.11.2014 Views

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

easily understood when one looks at the construction of our electric dipole: if<br />

the rigid stick is precessing, then the two charges have velocities that are equal<br />

and opposite (in circular motion around the centre of the stick, effectively),<br />

of order ε. But the values of their charges, q 1 and q 2 , are also equal and<br />

opposite, and, moreover, are of order ε −1 ; thus, the quantity qv for each of<br />

these charges is of the same sign, and is of order ε 0 . But this qv simply<br />

couples to the magnetic part of the Lorentz force law, qv×B; hence, we are<br />

led to the force (4.9).<br />

If we refer to the part (4.8) of the electric dipole force as the “gradient<br />

force”, then we clearly need to invent a name for the contribution (4.9).<br />

The author considers the term precession force to be a suitable name, since<br />

the force is fundamentally a coupling of the precession of the dipole to the<br />

external magnetic field. A more colourful name might be the term helicopter<br />

force, which evokes images of the particle “taking off” due to its rigid stick<br />

flaying around in the “air” of the magnetic field. Another suitable term might<br />

be the electric dipole Anandan force, because the magnetic dipole dual of<br />

(4.9), highlighted and emphasised by Anandan, has proved controversial in<br />

the last couple of years. Anandan was not the first to discover this force, of<br />

course; but historical precedent suggests that the person or persons who draw<br />

most attention to a phenomenon should have the effect named after them:<br />

for example, Aharonov and Bohm were not the first to suggest the Aharonov–Bohm<br />

effect [74]; Aharonov and Casher were not the first to suggest the<br />

Aharonov–Casher effect [107, 10]; etc. In any case, the author shall, for the<br />

purposes of this thesis, stick to the conservative term “precession force” for<br />

(4.9).<br />

Let us now consider the power into the electric dipole. We shall again<br />

simply add the powers into each electric charge, according to the Lorentz<br />

power expression (2.18),<br />

P = q 1 (v 1·E 1 ) + q 2 (v 2·E 2 );<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!