23.11.2014 Views

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

its discovery. Mathematically, the above prescription of course arises because<br />

the quantity<br />

(r· ˙v)<br />

has the same position dependence as the quantity<br />

(r·∇)<br />

in the Taylor expansion of the fields. However, the author does not yet have<br />

any intuitively simple explanation of why the prescription (4.45) is physically<br />

correct. We leave this as an exercise for the reader.<br />

We now turn to the redshift correction to the force expression. As with<br />

the above, the detailed analysis again finds that this extra contribution may<br />

be obtained by means of the redshift prescription (4.45):<br />

F redshift = ˙v(µ·B).<br />

4.2.4 Mechanical momentum of the current loop<br />

We now ask the following loaded question: What is the mechanical momentum<br />

of a stationary electric-current magnetic dipole?<br />

Before we answer this question, let us first explain its importance. In<br />

Chapter 2, we continually (and somewhat pedantically) reminded the reader<br />

that the force on a particle is the time rate of change of its mechanical momentum:<br />

F ≡ d t p.<br />

This is the only definition of “force” permissible. If you were to inscribe the<br />

laws of physics on stone tablets, this would go on the first one.<br />

Now, a point mass, possessing no other characteristics at all, has the<br />

following kinematical relationship between its velocity and its mechanical<br />

momentum:<br />

p ≡ mγv. (4.46)<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!