23.11.2014 Views

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

when the particle is in arbitrary motion—i.e., when ˙v, ˙σ, etc., are not zero?<br />

It is tempting to think that one may proceed simply from the static case,<br />

by formulating a Lorentz-covariant expression, and then deeming that this<br />

holds in all frames. But this brings us dangerously close to the error that<br />

Cohn made in his unfortunate 1969 paper [53]: one cannot simply analyse<br />

a static system, boost the results, and hope for the best, since the effects<br />

of acceleration will then automatically be lost—as a static system knows<br />

nothing of acceleration, and hence cannot possibly have terms involving it as<br />

a factor.<br />

Instead, we must proceed a little more carefully. Our plan of attack is<br />

as follows: Firstly, we shall evaluate the full expressions for the arbitrarymotion<br />

retarded fields, obtained in Section 5.4.6, for the extended model<br />

considered in the previous sections—namely, an infinitesimally small sphere<br />

(in its instantaneous rest frame) which has a uniform density of electromagnetic<br />

moment. We shall then (for technical reasons) shrink these expressions<br />

to a point, but then “regularise” them again using a mathematical trick used<br />

in standard electrodynamics textbooks. We shall then compute the threedivergence<br />

of the regularised point particle electric and magnetic fields thus<br />

computed: this will, from Maxwell’s equations, tell us what source densities<br />

are, assuming the expressions of Section 5.4.6 only. Finally, we can then add<br />

extra fields—such as the extra Maxwell field of Section 5.5.3—so that the<br />

Maxwell equations indicate the physically correct source current densities.<br />

To perform this procedure, however, we face a problem of a logistical<br />

nature, which is somewhat of an embarassment to the author: namely, in<br />

carrying out the steps above, we would in fact need to compute almost all<br />

of the aspects of the radiation reaction calculations, that is actually going<br />

to take up the remaining chapter of this thesis. It may therefore seem that<br />

it would have been better if the author had postponed this section to the<br />

end of Chapter 6, by which time all of those prerequisite results had in fact<br />

been presented. But the problem is that the worldline fields are, themselves,<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!