23.11.2014 Views

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

= 1 8( 4<br />

3 π(2ε)3 ) 2<br />

, (6.23)<br />

which is the expected result—the factor of 1/8 = 1/2 3 taking care of the<br />

“other half” of the factor of 2 6<br />

= 64 apparent increase in volume of the<br />

6-dimensional integration space (the Jacobian providing the other factor of<br />

1/8).<br />

We defer a computation of the integral (6.21) to Section 6.4.5; we shall<br />

first need to derive integrals over V d more complicated than (6.23).<br />

6.4.4 Explicit outer integrals<br />

While we have predicted that the r s -dependencies of the terms in our radiation<br />

reaction expressions will only be of one of the two forms (6.20) or<br />

(6.21), the r d -dependencies of the terms do not have such simplicity. In fact,<br />

they involve an almost arbitrary number of factors of r d , as well as factors<br />

r n d of the magnitude r d of r d . (The latter can be understood in terms of<br />

the discussion of Section 6.4: they arise as the leading-order term of single<br />

powers of R, the magnitude of R, which is also the negative of the value of<br />

the retarded time t ret (r, r ′ ).)<br />

Now, since the region of integration V d is spherically symmetric, the angular<br />

and radial integrals may be decoupled by the use of spherical coördinates.<br />

We shall consider the angular integrations shortly. For the case where the integrand<br />

in question is independent of r s , we simply need to consider integrals<br />

of the form<br />

η m ≡ 1 ( ) 4 −2 ∫ ∫<br />

4π 3 πε3 d 3 r d 3 r ′ 1<br />

,<br />

r≤ε r ′ ≤ε rd<br />

m<br />

where we are here defining the symbols η m , promised in Chapter 5. As with<br />

(6.23), these may be computed by elementary integration; by using the result<br />

(6.22), and simplifying somewhat, one finds that<br />

η m =<br />

72<br />

(2ε) m (3 − m)(4 − m)(6 − m) η 0. (6.24)<br />

246

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!