23.11.2014 Views

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

such systems. On the other hand, for systems of arbitrary mass, the four<br />

components of the mechanical momentum p α are clearly independent, since<br />

the identity<br />

p 2 (τ) ≡ m 2 (τ)<br />

is now a definition of the function m 2 (τ), rather than a constraint. But any<br />

use of the proper-time τ as the “time parameter” in the variational framework<br />

will always lead to the constraint (2.75) for the generalised velocities, and<br />

hence cannot yield a formalism embodying four truly independent degrees of<br />

freedom.<br />

The way out of this dilemma is to define a new time parameter, θ, related<br />

differentially to the proper-time by<br />

dθ(τ) ≡<br />

dτ<br />

m(τ) , (2.76)<br />

and use this new time parameter as the “time” parameter in the Euler–Lagrange<br />

formalism. The generalised velocities of the translational motion of<br />

the particle, in this new formalism, can be obtained by means of the chain<br />

rule:<br />

d θ z ≡ (d θ τ)(d τ z)<br />

≡ m(τ)U(τ)<br />

≡ p(τ);<br />

hence, in terms of the theta-time, the generalised velocities are simply the<br />

components of the mechanical momentum:<br />

d θ z(θ) ≡ p(θ).<br />

An additional benefit of using the theta-time θ is that massless particles<br />

may (in principle) be described by the formalism, since both θ and p are<br />

well-defined for such particles, but τ and U are not.<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!