23.11.2014 Views

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is over a square region in the x–x ′ plane; the domains of x and x ′ are each<br />

from −ε to ε, independent of the value of the other. If we define the new<br />

variables<br />

x d ≡ x − x ′ ,<br />

x s ≡ x + x ′ ,<br />

the domains of x d and x s are now clearly from −2ε to 2ε. The Jacobian<br />

∂(x, x ′ )<br />

∂(x s , x d ) = 1 2<br />

balances only half of this apparent fourfold increase in the area of integration.<br />

The other half is of course due to the fact that the original square area of<br />

integration has been rotated into a diamond shape. The consequence is that<br />

the limits of integration of the “inner” integral are no longer constant, but<br />

are rather dependent on the value of the variable in the “outer” integral.<br />

Explicitly, if we perform the x d integral outermost, the limits of integration<br />

for the inner x s integral are<br />

|x s | ≤ 2ε − |x d | ;<br />

the domain of integration for x s is now, on the average, half as long as the<br />

naïve maximum-minus-minimum calculation would suggest.<br />

The results of the equivalent considerations in the fully three-dimensional<br />

case are not as obvious—because we are not so adept at visualising six-dimensional<br />

geometry,—but nevertheless proceed in the same manner.<br />

The<br />

self-interactions that we are considering in this chapter are of the general<br />

form (6.4), namely<br />

( )<br />

ab 4 −2 ∫ ∫<br />

4π 3 πε3 d 3 r d 3 r ′ λ(r)f(r, r ′ ).<br />

r≤ε r ′ ≤ε<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!