23.11.2014 Views

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

as a mathematically G-covariant quantity. Any mathematical quantity that<br />

does not transform as a representation of the G group, and which, even if<br />

considered together with an arbitrary number of other quantities that do not<br />

transform as a representation of the G group, can still never be made to transform<br />

as a representation of the G group, is referred to as a mathematically<br />

non-G-covariant quantity.<br />

Any symbolic representation of a mathematically covariant quantity is<br />

referred to as a manifestly G-covariant quantity, or, simply, a G-covariant<br />

quantity, where the adjective “manifest” is used for emphasis or disambiguation.<br />

Any symbolic representation of a subpart of a G-covariant quantity, that<br />

is not itself mathematically G-covariant, is referred to as a non-G-covariant<br />

quantity.<br />

Note that, according to these definitions, for any given non-G-covariant<br />

quantity there always exist other non-G-covariant quantities such that, when<br />

considered together, the resultant structure is, as a whole, a G-covariant<br />

quantity. Thus, non-G-covariant quantities are never mathematically non-Gcovariant;<br />

conversely, mathematically non-G-covariant quantities are never<br />

non-G-covariant quantities. All quantities are either G-covariant, non-Gcovariant,<br />

or mathematically non-G-covariant quantities.<br />

These definitions appear to be counterintuitive, but their application will<br />

reveal their usefulness. In particular, the “mathematically” forms of the<br />

above definitions are rarely used in this thesis.<br />

When unambiguous, the “G-” prefix in the above may be omitted from<br />

a discussion where the group under consideration is understood. In such<br />

circumstances, the “G-” may be reïnserted at any point for emphasis or<br />

disambiguation.<br />

The adjective “covariant” is also used in its traditional form as a conjugate<br />

to “contravariant”, when applied to indices. This meaning of the word<br />

“covariant” has nothing to do with the definitions above.<br />

336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!