23.11.2014 Views

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Again noting the relations (4.23) and (4.26), and taking the point limit, we<br />

therefore find<br />

N = µ×B. (4.43)<br />

Equation (4.43) is the (completely uncontroversial) expression for the torque<br />

on an electric-current magnetic dipole. To see why it is uncontroversial,<br />

we only need note that—unlike the power and force expressions—this result<br />

(4.43) is the same as the result (4.19) found for the magnetic-charge dipole<br />

in the previous section.<br />

In fact, Hraskó [108] has shown why one must obtain this torque law<br />

for any object generating a magnetic dipole field, regardless of the nature<br />

of the object. He likewise showed why the Lorentz force must be obtained<br />

for any electric monopole. His proofs considered the mechanical momentum<br />

contained in the electromagnetic field surrounding the position of the charge<br />

or magnetic dipole, using essentially the same concept of “conservation of<br />

mechanical four-momentum” as the derivation in Section 2.3.8 of the Lorentz<br />

force. In fact, his proofs are much more satisfactory: he essentially uses the<br />

Dirac [68] method of considering the flow of mechanical four-momentum (via<br />

the mechanical stress-energy tensor) through the surface of a small volume<br />

surrounding the particle; this has the great theoretical advantage that the<br />

proof is now manifestly local, and independent of retardation effects, etc.<br />

Now, Hraskó found that the contributions to the integrals of the interior of<br />

the small volume surrounding the point particle vanish, for the monopole<br />

force and dipole torque, when the volume is shrunk to zero. However, for the<br />

power and force on a dipole, this integral over the small volume surrounding<br />

the particle does not vanish: it is, in fact, finite; and hence the internal field<br />

differences between the magnetic-charge dipole and electric-current magnetic<br />

dipole can (and do) lead to different power and force expressions. (The reason<br />

that these integrals do not vanish as with the monopole case is that the<br />

dipole field contains one extra power of 1/r over that of the monopole field;<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!