23.11.2014 Views

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that fall off as R −1 ), then we are ignoring the mechanical energy contained<br />

in the near fields (those that fall off as R −2 )—and, indeed, the interference<br />

between the near and far fields. Of course, if the system is accelerated for a<br />

certain finite period of time, and then left alone forever after, the near fields<br />

will eventually stabilise themselves, and only the mechanical energy pilfered<br />

by the radiation fields will come off the bottom line of the balance sheet<br />

for the mechanical energy. But this small amount of information is rarely<br />

acceptable to us: we would generally like to know what is happening now to<br />

the electric charge—as it is radiating—not what it will be doing next week.<br />

Thus, we clearly need to expand our considerations, to also take into account<br />

the near fields of the charge.<br />

But now we hit another problem: as we approach the position of the<br />

point charge, we find that the field (and hence mechanical energy density)<br />

expressions grow divergently. We must therefore be extremely careful how<br />

we evaluate integrals of the mechanical field energy density: we need to<br />

“regularise” them in such a way that we avoid any danger of manipulating<br />

infinite expressions meaninglessly. One way we can do this is to let the point<br />

particle have a finite size to start off with, and then shrink it to a point at the<br />

end of the calculations. Another way is to exclude a small region surrounding<br />

the charge, and take into account the energy and momentum crossing the<br />

boundary of this region when computing our balance sheets. Whichever way<br />

we proceed, we find that we can, in fact, obtain meaningful answers.<br />

But there is another, more deeply philosophical question that one may<br />

ask: who is responsible for this radiation reaction force? We have figured out<br />

what its effects are—by some nifty detective work,—but we have not really<br />

pinpointed its fundamental source. The Lorentz force law—which we can derive,<br />

most elegantly, from the interaction Lagrangian—does not give us any<br />

clue whatsoever that such a force is lurking on our doorsteps. Where else,<br />

then, could it come from? Maybe we have to add extra terms to our fundamental<br />

Lagrangian, by hand, that yield the correct force? Unfortunately—or,<br />

221

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!