23.11.2014 Views

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

disks. The magnetic dipole moment then decays slowly to zero, due to this<br />

frictional force. The crucial observation is that the time-changing magnetic<br />

dipole force induces, by Maxwell’s equations, an electric field in the space<br />

around the dipole. One can show that this electric field is given by<br />

E(t) =<br />

n× ˙µ<br />

4πr 2 .<br />

(This can, incidentally, also be obtained from the author’s retarded field<br />

expressions of Chapter 5, even though the author only considers ˙µ’s for which<br />

µ stays constant; it appears this result is quite general.) This electric field<br />

acts on the charge, and gives it a mechanical momentum impulse. Because<br />

the electric field depends on the rate of change of the magnetic moment, but<br />

the impulse integrates this force up again, the net impulse is independent of<br />

how slowly one lets the magnetic moment decay.<br />

Shockley and James then point out that there is no apparent counterbalancing<br />

force on the magnetic dipole! By taking the limit in which the<br />

charge’s m/q ratio is made to approach infinity, the velocity attained by the<br />

charge due to the imparted impulse can be made as arbitrarily small as one<br />

likes, and hence there is no substantial magnetic field induced by the charge<br />

that could act on the magnetic dipole. This may be taken to imply that the<br />

mechanical momentum of the total system is not conserved.<br />

Shockley and James suggested that a mechanical momentum excess contained<br />

in the electromagnetic field is a “hidden momentum” of the magnetic<br />

dipole; they then used this essentially as the ∆p of the Penfield–Haus effect.<br />

However, this is manifestly incorrect, as the discussions of Chapter 2<br />

show: the mechanical field momentum excess has already been counted in<br />

the derivation of the Lorentz force law, which in turn yields the “textbook”<br />

current loop force law. Thus, to add this excess field mechanical momentum<br />

again would be to count it twice.<br />

In fact, if one considers the question carefully, one finds that in fact there<br />

are three aspects of the physical situation that all have a mechanical momen-<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!