23.11.2014 Views

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

Single-Particle Electrodynamics - Assassination Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.2 Previous analyses<br />

To the author’s knowledge, the classical radiation reaction problem for particles<br />

carrying dipole moments has only been considered twice before: by<br />

Bhabha and Corben [40] in 1941, using the Dirac stress-energy method of<br />

derivation; and in a related analysis in 1989 by Barut and Unal [35], which<br />

did not consider the problem on completely classical grounds, but instead<br />

employed a semiclassical “zitterbewegung” model of spin.<br />

In Section 6.2.1, we briefly review the work of Bhabha and Corben, following<br />

by a review of the Barut–Unal analysis in Section 6.2.2.<br />

6.2.1 The Bhabha–Corben analysis<br />

As should by now be apparent, Bhabha and Corben attacked most of the<br />

oustanding problems of classical particles carrying dipole moments in their<br />

1941 paper [40]. The question of the radiation reaction is no exception.<br />

Bhabha and Corben used the method developed by Dirac only a few years<br />

earlier [68], of surrounding the worldline of the particle with a small tube,<br />

and considering the mechanical energy, momentum and angular momentum<br />

crossing this tube, for arbitrary motion of the particle. From conservation<br />

requirements, one can then deduce the force and torque on the particle.<br />

The method of Dirac was, at the time, a vast improvement on the Lorentz<br />

method of derivation, as it was manifestly covariant. The resulting covariant<br />

radiation reaction equation of motion for a charged particle is for this<br />

reason referred to as the Lorentz–Dirac equation. However, the basic Dirac<br />

method also has its drawbacks, alluded to in Section 6.1. In its raw form,<br />

it requires the form and coëfficient of the inertial term to be simply guessed<br />

at (see Dirac’s derivation [68]). This problem of arbitrariness has been overcome,<br />

in more recent times, by considering the retarded and advanced fields<br />

with somewhat more care [203, 204, 205]; or, somewhat more elegantly, math-<br />

226

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!