03.01.2015 Views

prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...

prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...

prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

above. Increasing scale and complexity <strong>of</strong> astronomical machinery brings increasing operations and<br />

development needs.<br />

Within AST, approximately 56 percent <strong>of</strong> resources are spent on current facility operations while<br />

10 percent is spent on instrumentation and 7 percent on future facilities and advanced technology<br />

development. 23 percent is spent on individual investigator grants in support <strong>of</strong> research, according to<br />

information provided by the survey’s infrastructure study groups. Within facilities funding,<br />

approximately 61 percent goes to national and university-based radio, 33 percent to national and<br />

university-based optical, and 6 percent to solar telescopes. In the committee's view (see below) this<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> resources is unbalanced: existing facilities are not being exploited efficiently because not<br />

enough is invested in modern instrumentation and in supporting the investigators who produce the science<br />

from these facilities and, furthermore, not enough is invested in the future through advanced technology<br />

development. Unless the budget increases, the only way to render balance is to close operating facilities<br />

and the mechanism for doing this is Senior Reviews.<br />

CONCLUSION: Maintaining an appropriate balance in NSF’s astronomy and astrophysics<br />

research portfolio and, by extension, balance in the health and scientific effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

NSF facilities requires a vigorous periodic senior review.<br />

Senior reviews are major endeavors and should not be undertaken lightly. <strong>The</strong>y should be seen as<br />

good stewardship <strong>of</strong> the NSF program.<br />

RECOMMENDATION: NSF-<strong>Astronomy</strong> should complete its next senior review before the<br />

mid-decade independent review that is recommended elsewhere in this report, so as to<br />

determine which, if any, facilities NSF-AST should cease to support in order to release<br />

funds for (1) the construction and ongoing operation <strong>of</strong> new telescopes and instruments, and<br />

(2) the science analysis needed to capitalize on the results from existing and future facilities.<br />

FIGURE 6‐6. Magnified view <strong>of</strong> solar convective and magnetic structures. Left panel: Computer<br />

simulation <strong>of</strong> convection on the Solar surface, together with emergent magnetic fields (twisted<br />

structure surrounding each granule). Right panel: Adaptive optics image <strong>of</strong> solar convection using a<br />

current Solar telescope. White threads map out the emergent magnetic field surrounding each<br />

granule. ATST will have sufficient spatial resolution to test these simulations against Solar data.<br />

Credit (right): Kiepenheuer‐Institut für Sonnenphysik, Vacuum Tower Telescope.<br />

PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION<br />

6-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!