03.01.2015 Views

prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...

prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...

prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

independent advice committee review the IXO case and examine progress in the mission design and<br />

readiness. If the review is favorable, NASA should be prepared to invest immediately in technology<br />

development at a high level, and work with the project to define the partnership agreements.<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> the above considerations, a budget <strong>of</strong> $4 million per year is recommended in the<br />

first several years <strong>of</strong> the decade to allow for risk reduction and mission definition, with an increase in the<br />

last half <strong>of</strong> the decade to a level <strong>of</strong> $20 million to $30 million per year, the minimum the committee<br />

estimates is necessary to develop critical technologies and prepare IXO to be mature and ready for<br />

consideration by the next decadal survey for a start soon thereafter. Descopes should be considered to<br />

ensure that the cost to NASA remains below $2 billion but reviewed to ensure that the baseline science<br />

requirements are still achieved. Investing 10 percent <strong>of</strong> NASA’s eventual cost is consistent with the<br />

committee’s other recommendations regarding mission-specific technology development. Prior to a start,<br />

NASA, in coordination with ESA and JAXA, should ensure that IXO’s principal risks are retired,<br />

including a down-select <strong>of</strong> the critical mirror technology, with sufficient maturation to demonstrate the<br />

performance, mass, and cost.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ranking <strong>of</strong> IXO as the fourth-priority large space mission reflects the technical, cost, and<br />

programmatic uncertainties associated with the project at the current time. However, many high-priority<br />

science questions require an X-ray observatory on this scale, continuing the great advances made by<br />

Chandra and XMM-Newton. Furthermore, the science <strong>of</strong> IXO is quite complementary to that <strong>of</strong> LISA.<br />

<strong>The</strong> committee therefore recommends that NASA begin by mid-decade an aggressive program to mature<br />

the mission and develop the technology so that this high-priority science mission can be realized.<br />

Recommendations for New Space Activities—Medium Projects<br />

Priority 1 (Medium, Space). New Worlds Technology Development Program for a 2020 Decade<br />

Mission to Image Habitable Rocky Planets<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing and most exciting fields in astrophysics is the study <strong>of</strong> planets beyond<br />

our solar system. <strong>The</strong> ultimate goal is to image rocky planets that lie in the habitable zone <strong>of</strong> nearby<br />

stars—at a distance from their star where water can exist in liquid form—and to characterize their<br />

atmospheres. Detecting signatures <strong>of</strong> biotic activity is within reach in the next 20 years if we lay the<br />

foundations this decade for a dedicated space mission in the next.<br />

Achieving this ultimate goal requires two main necessary precursor activities. <strong>The</strong> first is to<br />

understand the demographics <strong>of</strong> other planetary systems, in particular to determine over a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />

orbital distances what fraction <strong>of</strong> systems contain Earth-like planets. To this end, the committee<br />

recommends, as discussed earlier in this chapter, combined exploitation <strong>of</strong> the current Kepler mission,<br />

development and flight <strong>of</strong> the first-priority large mission WFIRST, and a vigorous ground-based research<br />

program. <strong>The</strong> second need is to characterize the level <strong>of</strong> zodiacal light present so as to determine, in a<br />

statistical sense if not for individual prime targets, at what level starlight scattered from dust will hamper<br />

planet detection. Nulling interferometers on NASA-supported ground-based telescopes (for example,<br />

Keck, and the Large Binocular Telescope) and/or on suborbital, SMEX, or MIDEX platforms could be<br />

used to constrain zodiacal light levels. A range <strong>of</strong> measurement techniques must be strongly supported to<br />

ensure that the detections extend to the relevant Earth-Sun distance range 16 for a sufficient sample <strong>of</strong><br />

systems. After these essential measurements are made, the need for a dedicated target finder can be<br />

determined and the approach for a space-imaging mission will be clear. <strong>The</strong> programs above will enable<br />

the optimal technologies to be selected and developed.<br />

For the direct detection mission itself, candidate starlight suppression techniques (for example,<br />

interferometry, coronagraphy, or star shades) should be developed to a level such that mission definition<br />

16 <strong>The</strong> Spitzer Space Telescope was sensitive to dust located at wide separations from stars, analogous to the<br />

solar system’s outer Kuiper belt, but not to analogs <strong>of</strong> the inner asteroid belt or the zodiacal dust close to Earth.<br />

PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION<br />

7-23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!