03.01.2015 Views

prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...

prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...

prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JWST, with its superb mid-infrared capability, will also use imaging and spectros<strong>copy</strong> transit<br />

techniques to study the atmospheres <strong>of</strong> exoplanets, a science capability that has been amply demonstrated<br />

by the currently operating Spitzer Space Telescope. JWST will be a premier tool for studying planets<br />

orbiting stars that are smaller and cooler than the Sun. Also promising are improved techniques on the<br />

ground for direct imaging <strong>of</strong> planets using adaptive optics. New instrumentation is required as well as<br />

significant amounts <strong>of</strong> observing time (for example, on the Gemini telescopes and the privately operated<br />

facilities accessible through NSF’s Telescope System Instrumentation Program). <strong>The</strong> proposed GSMTs<br />

could also play a crucial role in direct imaging studies with instruments suitably designed for this type <strong>of</strong><br />

work.<br />

In addition, enhancements to NASA’a suborbital and Explorer programs could provide testbeds<br />

for the development <strong>of</strong> occulter techniques such as star shades and coronagraphy, which are both<br />

immature, and technology development <strong>of</strong> astrometry and interferometry from space, so as to set the stage<br />

for an ambitious direct detection mission in the 2020s. <strong>The</strong> scientific contributions and technology<br />

development in these various areas are described in detail elsewhere. 8<br />

<strong>The</strong> culmination <strong>of</strong> the quest for nearby, habitable planets is a dedicated space mission. <strong>The</strong><br />

committee concluded that it is too early to determine what the design <strong>of</strong> that space mission should be, or<br />

even which planet-detection techniques should be employed. 9 It is not even clear whether searches are<br />

best carried out at infrared, optical, or even ultraviolet wavelengths. This choice awaits the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

observational studies just described, alongside a vigorous and adaptive program <strong>of</strong> theoretical and<br />

laboratory astrophysics investigations that will inform scientists about the diversity <strong>of</strong> exoplanet<br />

atmospheres. Although the case is compelling for technology development for a future space mission<br />

beginning early, its emphasis may shift as new discoveries from ground and space materialize. If progress<br />

is sufficiently rapid by mid-decade, then a decadal survey independent advice committee (as discussed in<br />

Chapter 3) could determine whether a more aggressive program <strong>of</strong> technology development should be<br />

undertaken, possibly including steps toward a technology down-select and a focus on key elements. Either<br />

way, decisions on significant, mission-specific funding <strong>of</strong> a major space mission should be deferred until<br />

the 2020 decadal survey, by which time the scientific path forward should be well determined.<br />

In summary, exoplanet astronomy is one <strong>of</strong> the most rapidly developing and unpredictable fields<br />

in modern astronomy. Both the statistical investigations <strong>of</strong> Kepler and WFIRST, and the location <strong>of</strong><br />

specific, nearby, potentially habitable Earths under a strong yet flexible program <strong>of</strong> ground-based<br />

research, are recommended. This combined approach will allow new techniques to be devised and<br />

surprising discoveries to be made during the coming decade; see Box 7-2.<br />

8 AAAC’s Exoplanet Task Force, 2008; JPL’s Exoplanet Community Report, 2009.<br />

9 In considering possible exoplanet missions for the next decade, the committee gave serious consideration<br />

to SIMLite but decided against recommending it. SIMLite is technically mature and would provide an important<br />

new capability (interferometry). Through precision astrometry it could characterize the architectures <strong>of</strong> 50 or so<br />

nearby planetary systems, provide targets for future imaging missions, and carry out other interesting astrophysics<br />

measurements. However, the committee considered that its large cost (appraised by the CATE process at $1.9<br />

billion) and long time to launch (estimated at 8.5 years) make it uncompetitive in the rapidly changing field <strong>of</strong><br />

exoplanet science. <strong>The</strong> planetary architecture science can be more efficiently carried out by the committee’s<br />

exoplanet strategy involving Kepler, WFIRST, and the ground-based program. <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> target-finding for future<br />

direct-detection missions, one not universally accepted as essential, can be done at least partially by pushing groundbased<br />

radial-velocity capabilities to a challenging but achievable precision below 10 centimeters per second. Finally,<br />

the ancillary astrophysics promised by SIMLite was not judged to be competitive.<br />

PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION<br />

7-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!