prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...
prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...
prepublication copy - The Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
JWST, with its superb mid-infrared capability, will also use imaging and spectros<strong>copy</strong> transit<br />
techniques to study the atmospheres <strong>of</strong> exoplanets, a science capability that has been amply demonstrated<br />
by the currently operating Spitzer Space Telescope. JWST will be a premier tool for studying planets<br />
orbiting stars that are smaller and cooler than the Sun. Also promising are improved techniques on the<br />
ground for direct imaging <strong>of</strong> planets using adaptive optics. New instrumentation is required as well as<br />
significant amounts <strong>of</strong> observing time (for example, on the Gemini telescopes and the privately operated<br />
facilities accessible through NSF’s Telescope System Instrumentation Program). <strong>The</strong> proposed GSMTs<br />
could also play a crucial role in direct imaging studies with instruments suitably designed for this type <strong>of</strong><br />
work.<br />
In addition, enhancements to NASA’a suborbital and Explorer programs could provide testbeds<br />
for the development <strong>of</strong> occulter techniques such as star shades and coronagraphy, which are both<br />
immature, and technology development <strong>of</strong> astrometry and interferometry from space, so as to set the stage<br />
for an ambitious direct detection mission in the 2020s. <strong>The</strong> scientific contributions and technology<br />
development in these various areas are described in detail elsewhere. 8<br />
<strong>The</strong> culmination <strong>of</strong> the quest for nearby, habitable planets is a dedicated space mission. <strong>The</strong><br />
committee concluded that it is too early to determine what the design <strong>of</strong> that space mission should be, or<br />
even which planet-detection techniques should be employed. 9 It is not even clear whether searches are<br />
best carried out at infrared, optical, or even ultraviolet wavelengths. This choice awaits the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />
observational studies just described, alongside a vigorous and adaptive program <strong>of</strong> theoretical and<br />
laboratory astrophysics investigations that will inform scientists about the diversity <strong>of</strong> exoplanet<br />
atmospheres. Although the case is compelling for technology development for a future space mission<br />
beginning early, its emphasis may shift as new discoveries from ground and space materialize. If progress<br />
is sufficiently rapid by mid-decade, then a decadal survey independent advice committee (as discussed in<br />
Chapter 3) could determine whether a more aggressive program <strong>of</strong> technology development should be<br />
undertaken, possibly including steps toward a technology down-select and a focus on key elements. Either<br />
way, decisions on significant, mission-specific funding <strong>of</strong> a major space mission should be deferred until<br />
the 2020 decadal survey, by which time the scientific path forward should be well determined.<br />
In summary, exoplanet astronomy is one <strong>of</strong> the most rapidly developing and unpredictable fields<br />
in modern astronomy. Both the statistical investigations <strong>of</strong> Kepler and WFIRST, and the location <strong>of</strong><br />
specific, nearby, potentially habitable Earths under a strong yet flexible program <strong>of</strong> ground-based<br />
research, are recommended. This combined approach will allow new techniques to be devised and<br />
surprising discoveries to be made during the coming decade; see Box 7-2.<br />
8 AAAC’s Exoplanet Task Force, 2008; JPL’s Exoplanet Community Report, 2009.<br />
9 In considering possible exoplanet missions for the next decade, the committee gave serious consideration<br />
to SIMLite but decided against recommending it. SIMLite is technically mature and would provide an important<br />
new capability (interferometry). Through precision astrometry it could characterize the architectures <strong>of</strong> 50 or so<br />
nearby planetary systems, provide targets for future imaging missions, and carry out other interesting astrophysics<br />
measurements. However, the committee considered that its large cost (appraised by the CATE process at $1.9<br />
billion) and long time to launch (estimated at 8.5 years) make it uncompetitive in the rapidly changing field <strong>of</strong><br />
exoplanet science. <strong>The</strong> planetary architecture science can be more efficiently carried out by the committee’s<br />
exoplanet strategy involving Kepler, WFIRST, and the ground-based program. <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> target-finding for future<br />
direct-detection missions, one not universally accepted as essential, can be done at least partially by pushing groundbased<br />
radial-velocity capabilities to a challenging but achievable precision below 10 centimeters per second. Finally,<br />
the ancillary astrophysics promised by SIMLite was not judged to be competitive.<br />
PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION<br />
7-9