09.01.2015 Views

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Settlements</strong> <strong>Review</strong>, Volume 1, Number 1, 2010<br />

that the Copenhagen process was an important<br />

milestone in the huge cultural transition which<br />

is continuing to gather momentum (Cullinan,<br />

2009).<br />

There is a movement in Latin America around<br />

“The Rights of Mother Earth” pioneered by<br />

Ecuador and Bolivia. The Bolivians supported<br />

by at least nine other Caribbean and Latin<br />

American countries are arguing that the reason<br />

why we have climate change and a host of<br />

environmental and social issues is that most<br />

political systems (whether based on capitalism<br />

or socialism) are inherently destructive<br />

because they do not take account of the needs<br />

to strike a balance between the interests of<br />

humans and those of other members of the<br />

Earth community (Cullinan 2009).<br />

Ecuador is exceptional in opting to make<br />

a fundamental change to the architecture<br />

of its governance system by recognising<br />

rights of Nature and redefining its concept of<br />

development. There the existence of a large<br />

number of people who had not wholly adopted<br />

Western consumerist values, appears to have<br />

been a crucial factor in securing the recognition<br />

of the rights of nature in the Constitution.<br />

Calls for a Universal Declaration of the Rights<br />

of Mother Earth to the United Nations indicate<br />

the potential for these ideas to spread rapidly.<br />

“In Latin America thus ‘defend the rights<br />

of Mother Earth’ is a battle cry not only for<br />

environmental protection but also for social<br />

justice and freedom from destructive cultural<br />

imperialism (Cullinan, 2009).<br />

“They point out that in the same way that a<br />

leaf will only flourish if it is part of a healthy<br />

plant growing in fertile, well-watered soil,<br />

so individual human wellbeing can only be<br />

sustained by building healthy communities<br />

within healthy ecological communities. This<br />

traditional wisdom is as valid today as it ever<br />

was. <strong>Human</strong> rights are meaningless and<br />

cannot be sustained if Earth has no rights. The<br />

right to life is an empty slogan without food and<br />

water which can only be provided by the Earth”<br />

(Cullinan, 2009)<br />

This movement appears to understand<br />

that mindless pursuit of GDP growth and<br />

material accumulation is a fatally defective<br />

developmental model. Recognising that the<br />

community of life which sustains us has a right<br />

to integrity and health and enforcing those<br />

rights is a precondition to maintaining healthy<br />

human communities, not a competing interest<br />

(Cullinan, 2009)<br />

Ecuador’s Constitution which aspires to “Living<br />

Well” is a strong indicator that a centuriesold<br />

logjam in legal and political thinking and<br />

practice is beginning to break-up. Pioneering<br />

work is being done around the world to replace<br />

laws and governance systems that facilitate<br />

the exploitation of Earth with systems based<br />

on the recognition that human well-being is<br />

a consequence of the well-being of the Earth<br />

systems that sustain us.<br />

The reasons why legal systems are failing to<br />

protect the Earth community is because they<br />

reflect the underlying beliefs that humans are<br />

separate from, and superior to, all other-thanhuman<br />

members of Earth whose primary role<br />

is to serve as “natural resources” for humans<br />

to consume. These beliefs are demonstrably<br />

false. <strong>Human</strong>s are of course, but one of many<br />

species of mammal that have co-evolved<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!