09.01.2015 Views

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Settlements</strong> <strong>Review</strong>, Volume 1, Number 1, 2010<br />

and small local industries in the fit-out/infill<br />

levels and full on-going participation by<br />

residents and users; it may be possible, with<br />

innovative design, to successfully include the<br />

poor within the city on land traditionally thought<br />

of as too expensive for lower income housing.<br />

Different income levels can be accommodated<br />

within the same support structures as the<br />

infill level allows for variety not only in shape,<br />

layout and form but also in costs. Thus the<br />

relevance of Open Building to South Africa is<br />

emphasised as a means to allow for different<br />

tenure forms and affordability levels within the<br />

same area, leading to the achievement of a<br />

residential mix.<br />

Mixed residential options may<br />

be grouped together in the<br />

same development where it is<br />

evident visually that there is a<br />

difference between the costs or<br />

tenure of the residential units.<br />

However, they may also be incorporated<br />

into a development<br />

where it would not be possible<br />

to easily distinguish between<br />

the different housing options.<br />

Mixed use may also imply that<br />

the different functions are in the<br />

same building or in seperate<br />

buildings.<br />

There are negative consequences of uniformly<br />

grouping low-income people in the same<br />

housing developments. Income mix, race mix<br />

and tenure mix would probably better help meet<br />

the restructuring goals of BNG. The objective<br />

of achieving an income mix should also be<br />

accompanied with a corresponding grading of<br />

quality levels – however what is argued here<br />

is that all people irrespective of income level<br />

or payment capability should benefit from a<br />

robust, permanent and high quality support<br />

level. This support, primary structure or base<br />

level of the environment then becomes the<br />

structuring framework for neighbourhoods<br />

(and perhaps cities).<br />

3.2.2 The public realm as the primary<br />

structure, support or base level<br />

The public realm could become the formal<br />

framework (the “support” or “base”); a<br />

permanent, long-term “structure” that allows<br />

for informal activity and interventions to<br />

occur within its parameters. In other words,<br />

allowing for the unexpected. This process<br />

would distribute the levels of decision making<br />

in the environment and separate them so as<br />

to reduce conflict and allow for the organic<br />

processes of human intervention to occur<br />

(what Hamdi refers to as emergence). Housing<br />

projects become catalysts for environmental<br />

transformation and structure and define<br />

242

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!