Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group
Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group
Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Settlements</strong> <strong>Review</strong>, Volume 1, Number 1, 2010<br />
of sand, a material so ubiquitous that it is<br />
routinely undervalued, to create affordable<br />
storeyed houses in Cape Town. In similar<br />
vein, architect Jo Noero interpreted four<br />
ordinary prototypes of free standing buildings<br />
to create a varied dense urban architecture in<br />
the Lenasia low-income housing project (see<br />
Sorrell, 2009).<br />
Using and Maintaining the Building<br />
Many decisions done at design stage in terms<br />
of passive measures and technologies can<br />
achieve good buildings with high levels of<br />
comfort and low environmental load without<br />
much initial expenditure<br />
Reuse of Existing Building<br />
Reusing existing buildings makes a lot of<br />
economic and environmental sense. The<br />
locked in embodied resources are not wasted<br />
and the no new resource demands are made.<br />
To be reusable, buildings must be designed to<br />
be adaptable to different users and uses based<br />
on flexibility in space sizes and configurations<br />
as well as on possibilities for altering the<br />
envelop.<br />
Demolishing<br />
When buildings get to finally be demolished,<br />
reuse of components is an alternative that<br />
can be explored. This particularly requires<br />
forethought in terms of designing for<br />
disassembly. In this regard for example,<br />
bolted connections can be better than nailed<br />
ones. Components of buildings which can<br />
be reused include bricks, windows, doors,<br />
wooden/structural structural members. The<br />
rubble itself can also be reused in numerous<br />
other ways. It is possible for communities<br />
to self-organise to recover as much from<br />
demolished buildings as possible. Apart from<br />
the usual definition of raw-materials as those<br />
unprocessed ones from nature, an innovative<br />
approach also includes (demolition and other)<br />
garbage as a potential source of raw-materials.<br />
Using garbage as a construction resource<br />
offers a number of advantages. It reduces<br />
the amount of garbage that must be thrown<br />
away/treated, it usually freely and locally<br />
available, and it can provide employment<br />
opportunities for the jobless. In a sense also,<br />
use of garbage for construction is a sure way<br />
to recover embodied resources and pre-empt<br />
consumption of more. The opportunities for<br />
innovation in seeing garbage as a building<br />
resource is immense. That a good designer<br />
can put garbage to refreshing architectural<br />
use is evident in the works of Nina Maritz (a<br />
graduate of the University of Cape Town) such<br />
as at Twyfelfontein Rock Art Museum Visitor<br />
Centre in Namibia. Another example is the<br />
Wat Pa Maha Chedio Kaew temple in Thailand<br />
where monks used approximately 1.5 million<br />
bottles to build a temple. More recently,<br />
a floating dining room was constructed in<br />
Vancouver with empty plastic bottle. Successful<br />
incorporation of garbage as a useful resource<br />
in the construction process is a sure way of<br />
achieving a sustainable system of construction<br />
over the entire lifecycle of building in a closed<br />
cradle-to-cradle loop.<br />
Government empowered self-help<br />
efforts<br />
To catalyse the incremental innovation activities<br />
described above, this paper recommends<br />
92