Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group
Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group
Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Settlements</strong> <strong>Review</strong>, Volume 1, Number 1, 2010<br />
In 2001, the CSIR was commissioned by<br />
the National Housing Department to carry<br />
out a study on the sustainability of human<br />
settlements in South Africa (Du Plessis,<br />
2003: 12-13). One of the chosen points of<br />
departure for determining the sustainability of<br />
existing human settlements was the quality<br />
of life offered to each member of society. The<br />
institutional determinants for the sustainability<br />
of settlements were based on the issues of<br />
financial capacity, institutional integration,<br />
operational efficiency, technical capacity and<br />
political will. The environmental indicators<br />
were centered on the issues of resource use,<br />
pollution and degradation, as well as protection<br />
of the environment.<br />
8.3 Sustainable building technology<br />
One could simply say that sustainable<br />
building technology is building technology<br />
that contributes to the creation of sustainable<br />
settlements. Though this is true, it does not<br />
provide many practical indications of ways<br />
in which to determine the sustainability of<br />
proposed building materials and construction<br />
techniques. For that purpose, it will be<br />
necessary to look more closely at the ways<br />
in which building materials and construction<br />
techniques have an impact on the environment,<br />
and how they affect sustainability in a broader<br />
sense (e.g. in terms of socio-economic<br />
factors). In addition, we will need to find ways<br />
to compare the different factors, in order<br />
to determine the total effect on sustainable<br />
development.<br />
8.4 Earth construction as a<br />
sustainable alternative<br />
The SANPAD project provided local<br />
entrepreneurs with exposure to the production<br />
of higher-quality blocks which could prove<br />
to be more acceptable to consumers, and<br />
which would also be more beneficial from an<br />
environmental point of view. Earth construction<br />
can justly be considered a sustainable<br />
alternative. With earth, good-quality buildings<br />
can be constructed, which are suited to the<br />
local climate and which also provide a healthy<br />
inner climate for the occupants.<br />
The production of sun-dried bricks uses<br />
up far less energy than, for instance, the<br />
production of concrete or bricks fired in a kiln.<br />
Manufacturing one fired brick consumes 2<br />
kWh of energy, whereas the manufacture of<br />
a cement-stabilised earth brick of the same<br />
size consumes 0, 05 kWh. Producing 1 m³ of<br />
concrete consumes 300-500 kWh, whereas<br />
the same volume of raw earth for building<br />
uses only 1% of this quantity of energy<br />
(Gerneke, 1992b: 36). Furthermore, sundrying,<br />
in contrast to baking, does not lead<br />
to the emission of harmful substances into<br />
the air (air pollution). Raw materials for the<br />
creation of earth blocks can be extracted from<br />
the production site, preventing the negative<br />
impacts on the environment that are caused<br />
by the transportation of materials to the site<br />
by road. Earth construction can also help to<br />
reduce the environmental impact caused by<br />
building waste.<br />
213