09.01.2015 Views

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Settlements</strong> <strong>Review</strong>, Volume 1, Number 1, 2010<br />

In 2001, the CSIR was commissioned by<br />

the National Housing Department to carry<br />

out a study on the sustainability of human<br />

settlements in South Africa (Du Plessis,<br />

2003: 12-13). One of the chosen points of<br />

departure for determining the sustainability of<br />

existing human settlements was the quality<br />

of life offered to each member of society. The<br />

institutional determinants for the sustainability<br />

of settlements were based on the issues of<br />

financial capacity, institutional integration,<br />

operational efficiency, technical capacity and<br />

political will. The environmental indicators<br />

were centered on the issues of resource use,<br />

pollution and degradation, as well as protection<br />

of the environment.<br />

8.3 Sustainable building technology<br />

One could simply say that sustainable<br />

building technology is building technology<br />

that contributes to the creation of sustainable<br />

settlements. Though this is true, it does not<br />

provide many practical indications of ways<br />

in which to determine the sustainability of<br />

proposed building materials and construction<br />

techniques. For that purpose, it will be<br />

necessary to look more closely at the ways<br />

in which building materials and construction<br />

techniques have an impact on the environment,<br />

and how they affect sustainability in a broader<br />

sense (e.g. in terms of socio-economic<br />

factors). In addition, we will need to find ways<br />

to compare the different factors, in order<br />

to determine the total effect on sustainable<br />

development.<br />

8.4 Earth construction as a<br />

sustainable alternative<br />

The SANPAD project provided local<br />

entrepreneurs with exposure to the production<br />

of higher-quality blocks which could prove<br />

to be more acceptable to consumers, and<br />

which would also be more beneficial from an<br />

environmental point of view. Earth construction<br />

can justly be considered a sustainable<br />

alternative. With earth, good-quality buildings<br />

can be constructed, which are suited to the<br />

local climate and which also provide a healthy<br />

inner climate for the occupants.<br />

The production of sun-dried bricks uses<br />

up far less energy than, for instance, the<br />

production of concrete or bricks fired in a kiln.<br />

Manufacturing one fired brick consumes 2<br />

kWh of energy, whereas the manufacture of<br />

a cement-stabilised earth brick of the same<br />

size consumes 0, 05 kWh. Producing 1 m³ of<br />

concrete consumes 300-500 kWh, whereas<br />

the same volume of raw earth for building<br />

uses only 1% of this quantity of energy<br />

(Gerneke, 1992b: 36). Furthermore, sundrying,<br />

in contrast to baking, does not lead<br />

to the emission of harmful substances into<br />

the air (air pollution). Raw materials for the<br />

creation of earth blocks can be extracted from<br />

the production site, preventing the negative<br />

impacts on the environment that are caused<br />

by the transportation of materials to the site<br />

by road. Earth construction can also help to<br />

reduce the environmental impact caused by<br />

building waste.<br />

213

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!