Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Human Settlements Review, Volume 1, Number 1, 2010 covering both construction and operational phases. Environmental Management Plan includes sustainable development criteria from this guide and show how these will be achieved. • Environmental Control Officer (ECO): An Environmental Control Office is appointed for the development. The ECO reports on the achievement of ROD development requirements, the EMP and sustainable development targets to management (and possibly to relevant stakeholders such as the future homeowners, the local community and local and provincial authorities). Reports are developed on a monthly basis during construction phases and on a two monthly basis during operation of the development. • Operational performance: Building user guides are developed for occupants of buildings to ensure that systems designed to support sustainability are maintained and operated optimally. • Operational performance: Facilities management manuals and monitoring requirements to ensure that systems designed to support sustainability are maintained and operated optimally. As minimum, energy, water and waste performance against targets should be reported on. • Independent certification: Commitment by developer that independent environmental rating or certification such as a ‘Greenstar’ rating or ‘Fair Trade in Tourism’ certification will be achieved. 22 Using the sustainable development criteria for built environment projects The sustainable development criteria for built environment projects can be used in a range of different ways. Their key use however is as a framework that can be used by developers to design projects and then to show how these projects have addressed sustainable development. As part of an iterative development process the criteria can be used to evaluate different options and strategies in order to rapidly identify the most sustainable solutions. Once a project has been have been developed, data tables and documentation, as outlined below, can be used to demonstrate how sustainable development has been addressed. This documentation helps to ensure that there can be effective evaluation of proposals and constructive interaction on key issues with key stakeholders before implementation occurs. 54
Human Settlements Review, Volume 1, Number 1, 2010 Land use categories* Existing Proposed Difference Difference site development (units) (%) Subsidy and affordable housing (m 2 ) Other residential (m 2 ) Business (m 2 ) Industrial (m 2 ) Education, community or institutional purposes (m 2 ) Resorts (m 2 ) Mining (m 2 ) Transport (m 2 ) Service infrastructure (m 2 ) Open space (m 2 ) Private open space (m 2 ) Agriculture (m 2 ) Total site area (m 2 ) Land use indicators Percentage of the site used for residential purposes (%) Percentage of the site used for education, community or institutional purposes (%) Percentage of the site that is open space (%) Percentage of site used for agriculture (%) Table 1. Data table for Land Use and Integrated Development. LU LU1 LU2 LU3 LU4 Land Use and Integrated Development Data table Spatial Development Frameworks Environmental Management Framework City Development Strategies Urban Development Boundary Documentation Completed data table, discussion of positive and negative differences (%) Extract of SDF, statement of compliance Extract of EMF, statement of compliance Extract of Strategy, statement of compliance Extract of SDF with Urban Development Boundary, indication of site location relative to boundary 55
Page 1 and 2:
Human Settlements Review VOLUME 1,
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENT Page FOREWORD i Design inst
Page 5 and 6:
Human Settlements Review, Volume 1,
Page 7 and 8: Human Settlements Review, Volume 1,
Page 35 and 36: Dictionary.com. 2010. alternative t
Page 57: Human Settlements Review, Volume 1,
Page 79 and 80: Table 4: Building technology - Soci
Page 105 and 106: ABSTRACT Human Settlements Review,
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
UNDP, 2005. Investing in Developmen
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Abstract Human Settlements Review,
Page 223 and 224:
Figure 1 Per Capita energy use and
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Figure 3 Model validation and resul
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
show all

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?