Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group
Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group
Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Settlements</strong> <strong>Review</strong>, Volume 1, Number 1, 2010<br />
contribution to make the creation of sustainable<br />
settlements and buildings needed in the<br />
future (Ozkan,2006, p. 108) as will be verified<br />
in the case study of Centani: Greenshops<br />
Financial Services Centre. Confirmed by<br />
Sawyer, (1992, p. vii) past and present<br />
indigenous knowledge does play a key role in<br />
sustainability. It seems imperative then, that an<br />
architectural perspective is created - in which<br />
valuable indigenous knowledge is integrated<br />
with equally valuable modern innovative<br />
knowledge (shown in the case study of the<br />
New Auditoria and Teaching Complex at the<br />
Fort Hare University), therefore enabling the<br />
development of settlements and buildings<br />
that are both contemporary and modern,<br />
yet which build upon the characteristics of<br />
the local vernacular traditions and therefore<br />
amalgamate within the cultural and ecological<br />
context.<br />
Indigenous knowledge and innovation is,<br />
according to Hirji (2002, p. 313), ‘a system of<br />
methods, customs and traditions developed<br />
over many generations, through a traditional<br />
way of life of an in-depth knowledge of a<br />
system or systems by local people.<br />
2.5. Apprenticeship:<br />
Xhosa-specific population that live in it.<br />
Architectural theory and practice, which<br />
encompasses all the factors that surround<br />
the art of building, is embedded within society<br />
and is passed on from one generation to the<br />
next by means of tradition and more often<br />
apprenticeship. It is when these cycles of<br />
transmission of information or technology<br />
are broken by outside forces that apprentice<br />
systems cease to be active (Ozkan, 2006, p.<br />
108). Unfortunately, changes that ignore the<br />
complex nature of social and environmental<br />
forces, yield architecture which, since 1994<br />
has been seen throughout the country in the<br />
Reconstruction and Development Programme<br />
(RDP).<br />
Parallel to this, the changes since 1994 - when<br />
South Africa became a democracy - have<br />
been marked in recent years as individuals,<br />
families and whole communities have left the<br />
rural areas, and, often with no homes to go<br />
to, migrated to the cities, resulting in various<br />
informal settlements or squatter camps and<br />
other social problems, alongside political<br />
changes, resulting in militaristic ranks or lowcost<br />
RDP housing schemes rarely taking into<br />
account the culture in particular and seldom<br />
reflecting the values of the indigenous people.<br />
The maintenance of an apprenticeship<br />
system, as was forged by Marchand (2006,<br />
p.51), in which one is bound to another to<br />
learn a trade that endows a community with<br />
not only technical skills but a sense of social<br />
identity and professional responsibility is the<br />
most effective way to guarantee a sustainable<br />
reproduction of a distinct architecture and<br />
an urban landscape imbued with changing<br />
and dynamic meaning for the Eastern Cape<br />
In a country where the scarcity of energy<br />
resources and synthetic materials is only likely<br />
to increase, the determination to make use of<br />
abundant local resources, the reintroduction of<br />
an apprenticeship system along with the desire<br />
to respect and engage with the complexities of<br />
cultures, historical contexts, tradition and the<br />
pressing needs of habitat, will most certainly<br />
give rise to impressive, durable and socially<br />
conscious architecture.<br />
160