09.01.2015 Views

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

Human Settlements Review - Parliamentary Monitoring Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Settlements</strong> <strong>Review</strong>, Volume 1, Number 1, 2010<br />

“Time” as a key factor in design and technical<br />

decision-making: concepts of accessibility,<br />

affordability, participation, choice, variety and<br />

change in the South African Housing sector<br />

.<br />

Amira Osman and Nosizo Sebake<br />

Sustainable <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Settlements</strong>, Built Environment, Unit Council for Scientific and<br />

Industrial Research (CSIR)<br />

1 Introduction<br />

This study refers to a design attitude that<br />

conceptualises ‘objects’ from a long term<br />

perspective, thus integrating a fourth<br />

dimension, i.e. time, in the design phase. The<br />

use of time in design is generally referred to<br />

as the “disentanglement” of buildings, systems<br />

and components by Open Building practitioners<br />

and researchers. Disentanglement in buildings<br />

presents many benefits on site during<br />

construction as well as throughout the lifetime<br />

of the building during its operational phase.<br />

The benefits of disentanglement also span<br />

over to the ultimate change in use, re-use (of<br />

the building or its salvaged components).<br />

The disentanglement of the levels of the built<br />

environment may offer a management and<br />

design tool that promotes participation and<br />

integration. A system of involving government,<br />

the private sector and communities in<br />

the development and management of a<br />

new type of rental and ownership stock is<br />

envisioned. For example, within a particular<br />

neighbourhood, government or the private<br />

sector may own and control a level of the<br />

environment refered to as the “support” level<br />

which is characterised by being relatively<br />

expensive, robust and permanent – this is a<br />

primary level. Communities, Social Housing<br />

Institutions or companies may lease these<br />

support structures on a long term basis and<br />

apply fit-out or infill as deemed appropriate for<br />

context, market demand, affordability levels,<br />

etc – this fit-out/infill level is refered to as the<br />

secondary level.<br />

This provides a mechanism for achieving city<br />

restructuring and introduces a new paradigm<br />

which may entail reformulating the housing<br />

construction sector. This approach may not<br />

only to be applied at the building level, but<br />

also at neighbourhood and city levels. This<br />

increase in scale enables this approach to<br />

have a true impact in terms of inclusionary<br />

housing, participation and providing the poor<br />

access to the city in legitimate ways.<br />

The differentiation between the primary<br />

and secondary levels of the environment<br />

allows for the accommodation of informal<br />

processes, the involvement of small scale<br />

builders and small local industries in the fitout/infill<br />

levels and full on-going participation<br />

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!