09.01.2015 Views

India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC

India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC

India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TABLE 5.3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>: U.S. food <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> agricultural exports <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> simulated effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n tariffs, by product group, 2007<br />

Product groups c<strong>on</strong>taining food <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

agricultural products<br />

2007 U.S. food<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> agricultural<br />

exports to <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Average,<br />

tradeweighted,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n<br />

applied<br />

tariff rate<br />

U.S. food <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

agricultural exports to<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g> in the absence<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n tariffs<br />

Simulated effects in ranges<br />

Change in U.S. food <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> agricultural<br />

exports to <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g> in the absence<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n tariffs<br />

Milli<strong>on</strong> $ Percent Milli<strong>on</strong> $ Milli<strong>on</strong> $ Percent<br />

Paddy rice 0.22 80 1.24─12.04 1.02─11.82 462─5,342<br />

Wheat 0 0 0─0 0─0 0─0<br />

Cereal grains n.e.c. 1.13 1 1.11─1.09 -0.02─ -0.04 -2─ -4<br />

Vegetables, fruit, nuts 282.69 18 331.21─342.89 48.53─60.20 17─21<br />

Oil seeds 0 32 0─0 0─0 0─0<br />

Sugar cane, sugar beet 0 30 0─0 0─0 0─0<br />

Plant-based fibers 78.55 10 81.55─104.97 3.00─26.43 4─34<br />

Crops n.e.c. 8.26 20 13.45─14.31 5.19─6.06 63─73<br />

Bovine cattle, sheep <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> goats, horses 0.12 30 0.17─0.20 0.06─0.09 47─73<br />

Animal products n.e.c. 6.95 8 7.32─7.44 0.37─0.49 5─7<br />

Wool, silkworm coco<strong>on</strong>s 5.84 15 8.87─11.75 3.03─5.91 52─101<br />

Forestry 0.75 30 1.26─1.49 0.51─0.74 69─99<br />

Fishing 0.08 10 0.09─0.10 0.01─0.01 9─15<br />

Bovine meat products 0.05 30 0.10─0.16 0.05─0.11 102─214<br />

Meat products n.e.c. 0.11 49 0.16─0.17 0.05─0.06 44─53<br />

Vegetable oils <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> fats 15.35 52 50.92─65.11 35.57─49.76 232─324<br />

Dairy products 8.20 34 19.07─23.67 10.87─15.46 133─189<br />

Processed rice 0.06 76 0.13─0.54 0.07─0.48 107─781<br />

Sugar 1.51 98 4.76─18.23 3.25─16.72 215─1,107<br />

Food products n.e.c. 45.96 61 115.09─121.51 69.13─75.55 150─164<br />

Beverages <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> tobacco products 4.19 103 6.74─7.96 2.55─3.77 61─90<br />

Textiles 0.25 26 0.50─0.51 0.25─0.26 98─102<br />

Wearing apparel 0.01 13 0.01─0.01 0.00─0.00 20─21<br />

Leather products 2.58 25 4.81─5.03 2.23─2.45 86─95<br />

Chemical, rubber, plastic products 14.72 30 28.70─29.31 13.99─14.59 95─99<br />

Manufactures n.e.c. 0.03 30 0.06─0.06 0.03─0.03 112─121<br />

Total 477.61 24 677.35─768.57 199.74─290.96 42─61<br />

Source: Commissi<strong>on</strong> calculati<strong>on</strong>s with simulati<strong>on</strong> framework discussed in appendix H.<br />

Notes: (1) Simulated effects for 699 HS6 products have been grouped in 26 broad product groups as these groups are specified in the<br />

GTAP global trade model. Most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the product groups are composed <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>ly agricultural products. The following product groups, however,<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tain other products—forestry; fishing; textiles; wearing apparel; leather products; chemical, rubber <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> plastic products; <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

manufactures n.e.c. (2) <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n tariff rates for staples fluctuate from year to year. Thus, the simulated effects for 2007 shown here could be<br />

different than effects for other years. (3) A range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> simulated effects was obtained by varying the magnitude <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> trade elasticities to account<br />

for the degree <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> statistical uncertainty in the ec<strong>on</strong>ometric estimates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the elasticities. (4) The acr<strong>on</strong>ym n.e.c. means not elsewhere<br />

classified.<br />

5-18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!