09.01.2015 Views

India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC

India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC

India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For most crops, however, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n agricultural productivity is significantly below world<br />

averages, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong> increases have slowed. 16 With the excepti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cott<strong>on</strong>, current<br />

seed varieties used in <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g> are not producing the rapid annual gains in crop yields that<br />

existed 20–30 years ago. The overuse <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fertilizer <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> low-cost electricity for pumping<br />

groundwater has led to deteriorating soils <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> shrinking groundwater supplies. 17 In<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>, large increases in government expenditures for input support programs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

migrant farm labor payments over the last five years have crowded out public investment<br />

in agricultural research, extensi<strong>on</strong> services, irrigati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> other rural infrastructure<br />

projects. Research suggests that <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s public expenditure patterns in agriculture have<br />

not maximized l<strong>on</strong>g-term sustainable ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth. 18 In particular, l<strong>on</strong>g-term capital<br />

underinvestment in irrigati<strong>on</strong> infrastructure undermined agricultural yields in 2009, as<br />

drought affected planted areas in Delhi, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Uttar Pradesh. 19<br />

Recent Producti<strong>on</strong> Trends<br />

During MYs 2003/04–2007/08, the volume <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> many major commodities<br />

grew rapidly in <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g> (table 4.1), despite the slowdown in overall growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n<br />

agriculture relative to previous periods. Most major commodities showed double-digit<br />

increases for the period. The producti<strong>on</strong> volume <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cott<strong>on</strong> nearly doubled during this<br />

period, a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> favorable weather <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the increased use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid varieties <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bt<br />

cott<strong>on</strong>. Poultry, soybean, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> milk producti<strong>on</strong> grew extremely rapidly as well, boosted by<br />

increased domestic dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Producti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> food grains is heavily influenced by government procurement prices. These<br />

increased over the period, resulting in faster rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth after MY 2006/07, following<br />

several poor harvests as a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> unfavorable weather. Although the planted area<br />

remained relatively steady, wheat, rice, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> coarse grains benefited from favorable<br />

weather in MY 2007/08 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> reportedly from greater distributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> improved seeds to<br />

farmers that resulted in higher yields. 20 The area planted with wheat increased slightly<br />

after MY 2005/06, mostly at the expense <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> mustard/rapeseed, because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the lower<br />

relative support price for rapeseed vis-à-vis wheat. 21 Pulses (e.g., peas, beans, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> lentils)<br />

producti<strong>on</strong> has generally been stagnant since the 1970s. There have been few varietal<br />

improvements for domestic pulse producti<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>ly a small share <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong> is<br />

under irrigati<strong>on</strong>. 22 As a result, yields have not increased compared to other crops, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

planted area has not exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed, eroding its pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>itability relative to other crops, such as<br />

wheat <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> rice. 23<br />

Major oilseed producti<strong>on</strong> increased by 18 percent between MY 2003/04 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

MY 2007/08, driven in large part by increases in soybeans. High domestic market prices<br />

for soybeans <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> groundnuts (peanuts) toward the end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the period encouraged<br />

16 L<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>es, “<str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n Agriculture <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Policy in Transiti<strong>on</strong>,” 2008, 19.<br />

17 Jha et al., “<str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n Wheat <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rice Sector Policies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Implicati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Reform,” May 2007, 2.<br />

18 Persaud <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rosen, “<str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s C<strong>on</strong>sumer <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Price Policies,” Food Security Assessment, February 2003,<br />

34–35.<br />

19 Balch<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, “Agricultural Situati<strong>on</strong> to Be Reviewed,” The Hindu, July 9, 2009.<br />

20 Govindan, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>: Grain <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Feed, May 6, 2008, 3.<br />

21 Govindan, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>: Grain <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Feed, January 10, 2007, 3.<br />

22 Industry representative, interview with Commissi<strong>on</strong> staff, New Delhi, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, May 26, 2009.<br />

23 Price, L<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>es, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Govindan, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s Pulse Sector, May 2003, 3.<br />

4-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!