India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC
India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC
India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
For most crops, however, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n agricultural productivity is significantly below world<br />
averages, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong> increases have slowed. 16 With the excepti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cott<strong>on</strong>, current<br />
seed varieties used in <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g> are not producing the rapid annual gains in crop yields that<br />
existed 20–30 years ago. The overuse <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fertilizer <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> low-cost electricity for pumping<br />
groundwater has led to deteriorating soils <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> shrinking groundwater supplies. 17 In<br />
additi<strong>on</strong>, large increases in government expenditures for input support programs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
migrant farm labor payments over the last five years have crowded out public investment<br />
in agricultural research, extensi<strong>on</strong> services, irrigati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> other rural infrastructure<br />
projects. Research suggests that <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s public expenditure patterns in agriculture have<br />
not maximized l<strong>on</strong>g-term sustainable ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth. 18 In particular, l<strong>on</strong>g-term capital<br />
underinvestment in irrigati<strong>on</strong> infrastructure undermined agricultural yields in 2009, as<br />
drought affected planted areas in Delhi, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan,<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Uttar Pradesh. 19<br />
Recent Producti<strong>on</strong> Trends<br />
During MYs 2003/04–2007/08, the volume <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> many major commodities<br />
grew rapidly in <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g> (table 4.1), despite the slowdown in overall growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n<br />
agriculture relative to previous periods. Most major commodities showed double-digit<br />
increases for the period. The producti<strong>on</strong> volume <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cott<strong>on</strong> nearly doubled during this<br />
period, a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> favorable weather <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the increased use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid varieties <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bt<br />
cott<strong>on</strong>. Poultry, soybean, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> milk producti<strong>on</strong> grew extremely rapidly as well, boosted by<br />
increased domestic dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />
Producti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> food grains is heavily influenced by government procurement prices. These<br />
increased over the period, resulting in faster rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth after MY 2006/07, following<br />
several poor harvests as a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> unfavorable weather. Although the planted area<br />
remained relatively steady, wheat, rice, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> coarse grains benefited from favorable<br />
weather in MY 2007/08 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> reportedly from greater distributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> improved seeds to<br />
farmers that resulted in higher yields. 20 The area planted with wheat increased slightly<br />
after MY 2005/06, mostly at the expense <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> mustard/rapeseed, because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the lower<br />
relative support price for rapeseed vis-à-vis wheat. 21 Pulses (e.g., peas, beans, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> lentils)<br />
producti<strong>on</strong> has generally been stagnant since the 1970s. There have been few varietal<br />
improvements for domestic pulse producti<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>ly a small share <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong> is<br />
under irrigati<strong>on</strong>. 22 As a result, yields have not increased compared to other crops, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
planted area has not exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed, eroding its pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>itability relative to other crops, such as<br />
wheat <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> rice. 23<br />
Major oilseed producti<strong>on</strong> increased by 18 percent between MY 2003/04 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
MY 2007/08, driven in large part by increases in soybeans. High domestic market prices<br />
for soybeans <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> groundnuts (peanuts) toward the end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the period encouraged<br />
16 L<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>es, “<str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n Agriculture <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Policy in Transiti<strong>on</strong>,” 2008, 19.<br />
17 Jha et al., “<str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n Wheat <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rice Sector Policies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Implicati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Reform,” May 2007, 2.<br />
18 Persaud <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rosen, “<str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s C<strong>on</strong>sumer <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Price Policies,” Food Security Assessment, February 2003,<br />
34–35.<br />
19 Balch<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, “Agricultural Situati<strong>on</strong> to Be Reviewed,” The Hindu, July 9, 2009.<br />
20 Govindan, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>: Grain <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Feed, May 6, 2008, 3.<br />
21 Govindan, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>: Grain <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Feed, January 10, 2007, 3.<br />
22 Industry representative, interview with Commissi<strong>on</strong> staff, New Delhi, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, May 26, 2009.<br />
23 Price, L<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>es, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Govindan, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s Pulse Sector, May 2003, 3.<br />
4-3