India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE 6.3 <strong>India</strong>: Estimated tariff equivalents <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong>n NTMs, 2005–07 Estimated ad valorem tariff equivalent <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong>n NTMs on U.S. exports Commodity groups containing food <strong>and</strong> agricultural products For identified products For GTAP sector Estimated ad valorem tariff equivalent <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong>n NTMs on rest-<strong>of</strong>-world exports For identified products For GTAP sector Percent Wheat ( a ) ( a ) 45.4 45.4 Cereal grains n.e.c. 260.6 150.5 85.8 77.4 Meat products n.e.c. 22.1 8.3 13.8 1.4 Dairy products 49.0 26.7 43.7 11.2 Beverages <strong>and</strong> tobacco products 199.2 75.1 199.7 20.0 Leather products 183.4 2.2 43.7 12.9 Average tariff equivalent 81.7 13.1 46.0 34.6 Source: Commission staff calculations. Note: Averages for total calculated from Harmonized System six-digit subheading level data; “not elsewhere classified” is denoted as “n.e.c.” a Not applicable. world are large although U.S. exports to <strong>India</strong> are zero. Using this narrowed list <strong>of</strong> products, Commission staff then estimated the economic effects <strong>of</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>India</strong>n NTMs using the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model, using 2007 trade data as the baseline. 6-20
Bibliography American Apparel <strong>and</strong> Footwear Association. “Labeling,” n.d. http://www.apparel<strong>and</strong>footwear.org/LegislativeTradeNews/LabelingIssues.asp (accessed June 11, 2009). Aradhey, Amit. <strong>India</strong>: Grain <strong>and</strong> Feed; Pulse Situation <strong>and</strong> Outlook, 2007. GAIN Report no. IN8005. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, December 14, 2007. Asia-Pacific Council <strong>of</strong> American Chambers <strong>of</strong> Commerce (APCAC). “Corruption,” n.d. http://www.asce.org/files/pdf/global/apcacccorruption04.pdf (accessed June 11, 2009). AsiaPulse News. “<strong>India</strong> to Use ‘Counter Trade’ to Boost Grain Export,” March 25, 2002. Beghin, John C. “<strong>Nontariff</strong> Barriers.” Working Paper 06-WP 438, Center for Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Rural Development, Iowa State University, December 2006. http://www.econ.iastate.edu/research/webpapers/paper_12703.pdf. Begovic, Boris. “Trade Liberalization: The Way Forward.” Paper presented at “Freedom, Commerce, <strong>and</strong> Peace: A Regional Agenda,” Tbilisi, Georgia, October 25–27, 2006. http://www.cato.org/events/tbilisiconf2006/papers/trade_liberalization.pdf. FDIMagazine. “Countertrade Still Thrives.” December 8, 2003. http://www.fdimagazine.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/458/Countertrade_still_thrives.html. Das, S<strong>and</strong>ip. “ICAR Body to Study Socio Economic Impact <strong>of</strong> BT Brinjal.” Financial Express, August 13, 2009. http://www.financialexpress.com/news/icar-body-to-study-socio-economic-impact-<strong>of</strong>bt-brinjal/501295/. Dhankhar, Deepa. GOI Amends PFA Rules Relating to Carbonated Water. GAIN Report no. IN9087. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, June 30, 2009. ———. <strong>India</strong>: Livestock <strong>and</strong> Products; Annual, 2007. GAIN Report no. IN7094. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, October 1, 2007. ———. <strong>India</strong>: Livestock <strong>and</strong> Products; Annual, 2008. GAIN Report no. IN8098. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, September 2, 2008. ———. <strong>India</strong>: Livestock <strong>and</strong> Products; Annual, 2009. GAIN Report no. IN9119. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, September 14, 2009. Distilled Spirits Council <strong>of</strong> the United States (DISCUS). Written submission to the U.S. International Trade Commission in connection with inv. no. 332-504, <strong>India</strong>: <strong>Effects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tariffs</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Nontariff</strong> <strong>Measures</strong> on U.S. Agricultural Exports, June 25, 2009. Food <strong>and</strong> Agricultural Organization <strong>of</strong> the United Nations (FAO). Import Policy Instruments. FAO Corporate Document Repository, n.d. http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/ILRI/x5503E/x5503e05.htm (accessed September 16, 2009). Galligan, D. J. Due Process <strong>and</strong> Fair Procedures: A Study <strong>of</strong> Administrative Procedures. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. 6-21
Page 1 and 2:
United States International Trade C
Page 3 and 4:
U.S. International Trade Commission
Page 5:
Abstract This report describes <str
Page 8 and 9:
TABLE ES.1 India:
Page 10 and 11:
U.S. agricultural products face str
Page 12 and 13:
U.S. Foreign Direct Investment U.S.
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTS Page Abstract ............
Page 17 and 18:
CONTENTS―Continued Chapter 6 <str
Page 19 and 20:
CONTENTS―Continued Figures 1.1. <
Page 21 and 22:
ACRONYMS AND TERMS AAY Antodaya Ann
Page 23:
ACRONYMS AND TERMS—Continued RGGV
Page 26 and 27:
TABLE 1.1 India: A
Page 28 and 29:
FIGURE 1.1 India:
Page 30 and 31:
India’s central
Page 32 and 33:
Despite their weak economic pr<stro
Page 34 and 35:
Approach Current India</str
Page 36 and 37:
Bibliography Birner, Regina, Surupt
Page 38 and 39:
World Bank. Agriculture for Develop
Page 40 and 41:
FIGURE 2.1 India:
Page 42 and 43:
TABLE 2.1 India: A
Page 44 and 45:
FIGURE 2.3 India:
Page 46 and 47:
premium); (2) India</strong
Page 48 and 49:
include government export restricti
Page 50 and 51:
TABLE 2.3 India: A
Page 52 and 53:
FIGURE 2.6 India:
Page 54 and 55:
Exports by Major Trading Partner <s
Page 57 and 58:
CHAPTER 3 Domestic Consumption Over
Page 59 and 60:
TABLE 3.2 India: P
Page 61 and 62:
more likely to have been exposed to
Page 63 and 64:
BOX 3.3 Indian Con
Page 65 and 66:
TABLE 3.3 India: T
Page 67 and 68:
are expected to see income growth <
Page 69 and 70:
Food Preferences India</str
Page 71 and 72:
Regional Variation Geographic <stro
Page 73 and 74:
CCC. “Know India
Page 75 and 76:
CHAPTER 4 Indian A
Page 77 and 78:
For most crops, however, In
Page 79 and 80:
The Farm Sector soybeans 29 —but
Page 81 and 82:
Food processing in India</s
Page 83 and 84:
BOX 4.1 The Central Government’s
Page 85 and 86:
BOX 4.2 Does the Minimum Support Pr
Page 87 and 88:
August 3, 2009, New Delhi announced
Page 89 and 90: known as zamindars, have doubled or
Page 91 and 92: that the PFA Act was strictly enfor
Page 93 and 94: ———. Bharat Nirman: A Time-Bo
Page 95 and 96: Organisation for Economic Co-operat
Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 5 TARIFFS Overview
Page 99 and 100: sensitive. They include vegetable f
Page 101 and 102: wholly milled rice and</str
Page 103 and 104: The Indian governm
Page 105 and 106: India also reporte
Page 107 and 108: Reference Prices Reference prices,
Page 109 and 110: Landing Fees <stro
Page 111 and 112: Simulated Effects
Page 113 and 114: and nuts” by $0.
Page 115 and 116: 5-19 TABLE 5.4 India</stron
Page 117 and 118: Bibliography Acharya, Keya. “Thor
Page 119 and 120: Indian Express.com
Page 121 and 122: CHAPTER 6 Nontariff</strong
Page 123 and 124: foreign sources. 6 For example, SPS
Page 125 and 126: BOX 6.1 Milk and M
Page 127 and 128: BOX 6.2 Wheat—Continued Yet, <str
Page 129 and 130: perpetuated continuously. The impor
Page 131 and 132: notices that must be integrated wit
Page 133 and 134: import corn under the TRQ is too bu
Page 135 and 136: Customs Procedures India</s
Page 137 and 138: Corruption Interests within <strong
Page 139: TABLE 6.2 India: E
Page 143 and 144: Mattson, Jeremy W., Won, W. Koo, <s
Page 145: ———. 2009 National Trade Esti
Page 148 and 149: TABLE 7.1 India: C
Page 150 and 151: First Point of Sal
Page 152 and 153: Private mandis Som
Page 154 and 155: approximately 65 million households
Page 156 and 157: 7-10 TABLE 7.2 India</stron
Page 158 and 159: poor communications infrastructure
Page 160 and 161: limited popularity with farmers bec
Page 162 and 163: The lack of infras
Page 164 and 165: found that 39 percent of</s
Page 166 and 167: Bibliography Banerjee, A. Dairying
Page 168 and 169: Tiwari, Shri Rajendra Kumar. “Pos
Page 170 and 171: FDI Regulations and</strong
Page 172 and 173: TABLE 8.2 India: A
Page 174 and 175: Food Processing and</strong
Page 176 and 177: There is not necessarily a strong l
Page 178 and 179: For processing of
Page 180 and 181: BOX 8.3 Restrictions on Foreign Joi
Page 182 and 183: Under certain circumstances, FDI ca
Page 184 and 185: commenced. States tend to be quick
Page 186 and 187: Bibliography Bahn, Niti, an
Page 188 and 189: International Center for Alcohol Po
Page 190 and 191:
Structure of the <
Page 192 and 193:
BOX 9.1 The UPOV System for Plant V
Page 194 and 195:
that the public sector in I
Page 196 and 197:
Whether this situation will soon ch
Page 198 and 199:
The U.S.-India Bus
Page 200 and 201:
eggplant, which began field trials
Page 202 and 203:
Maskus, Keith E. “Intellectual Pr
Page 205:
APPENDIX A REQUEST LETTER
Page 208 and 209:
The Honorable Sham L. Arano
Page 211 and 212:
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTI
Page 213:
APPENDIX C HEARING WITNESSES
Page 216 and 217:
ORGANIZATION AND WITNESS: Tuttle Ta
Page 219 and 220:
Summary of Views <
Page 221 and 222:
advertising and pr
Page 223 and 224:
highest in the Asia-Pacific region.
Page 225 and 226:
to U.S. exports to India</s
Page 227 and 228:
transparent sanitary regulations th
Page 229 and 230:
hotel and catering
Page 231 and 232:
Western Pistachio Association 26 In
Page 233:
APPENDIX E POTENTIAL FOR U.S. AGRIC
Page 236 and 237:
E-4 TABLE E.1 India</strong
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 243:
APPENDIX F INDIAN AGRICULTURAL PROD
Page 246 and 247:
TABLE F.1 India: A
Page 248 and 249:
FIGURE F.1 India:
Page 250 and 251:
is in nonirrigated areas with yield
Page 252 and 253:
Consumption India
Page 254 and 255:
efrigeration. This characteristic i
Page 256 and 257:
70 percent of tota
Page 258 and 259:
eportedly preferred in southern <st
Page 260 and 261:
Cotton During MY 2003/04-2007/08, <
Page 262 and 263:
Government of <str
Page 265:
APPENDIX G UNION AND STATE/UNION TE
Page 268 and 269:
certain agricultural goods in the p
Page 270 and 271:
Bibliography Chaulan, Shri U.K. “
Page 273 and 274:
Simulation Framework The effects <s
Page 275 and 276:
Producers determine the optimal sup
Page 277 and 278:
Applied ad valorem tariff equivalen
Page 279 and 280:
We considered the possibility that
Page 281 and 282:
Estimation of <str
Page 283 and 284:
Bibliography Anderson, Kym, Mariann
show all

India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?