09.01.2015 Views

India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC

India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC

India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 6<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>N<strong>on</strong>tariff</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Measures</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Overview<br />

U.S. agricultural exports to <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g> face a wide array <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>tariff measures (NTMs), whose<br />

applicati<strong>on</strong> either raises the cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> exporting U.S. agricultural products to <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumers or bars those exports completely. 1 As internati<strong>on</strong>al agreements have resulted<br />

in the general lowering <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> agricultural tariff rates worldwide, the prominence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> NTMs in<br />

certain countries as the next “line <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> defense” has increased. 2 Unlike tariffs, which are<br />

normally applied equally to all trading partners, NTMs can affect agricultural imports<br />

from some countries disproporti<strong>on</strong>ately. 3 Furthermore, certain NTMs have no practical<br />

effect when other NTMs are more trade restricting; U.S. exporters <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> agricultural<br />

products are well aware that resolving <strong>on</strong>e NTM may <strong>on</strong>ly make others more prominent. 4<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n NTMs identified as hindering U.S. agricultural exports include quality st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ards<br />

<strong>on</strong> certain processed foods, fumigati<strong>on</strong> requirements for pulses, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> government<br />

m<strong>on</strong>itoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> import volumes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fruits <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> nuts, cott<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> alcoholic beverages. <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n<br />

NTMs reported to effectively block U.S. agricultural exports include unattainable<br />

st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ards for purity in wheat exports; n<strong>on</strong>–science-based health st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ards for poultry,<br />

swine, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> dairy exports; <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> effective bans <strong>on</strong> most U.S. products c<strong>on</strong>taining genetically<br />

modified organisms (GMOs). More broadly, all U.S. exports are affected by certain types<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> systemic <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>transparent <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n NTMs, such as inefficient regulatory notice <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

comment procedures, corrupti<strong>on</strong> at the ports <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> entry, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> burdensome or irregular<br />

customs procedures.<br />

Identifying trade c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s that are covered by rules or guidelines in World Trade<br />

Organizati<strong>on</strong> (WTO) agreements as NTMs can be difficult, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> negotiating to lower or<br />

remove the measures can be time c<strong>on</strong>suming. 5 Certain NTMs facing U.S. agricultural<br />

1 Matts<strong>on</strong>, Koo, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Taylor, “N<strong>on</strong>-Tariff Trade Barriers in Agriculture,” March 2004, 1. The World<br />

Trade Organizati<strong>on</strong> (WTO), the World Bank, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the United Nati<strong>on</strong>s C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong> Trade <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Development<br />

(UNCTAD) hosted a recent trade c<strong>on</strong>ference during which NTMs were defined using a fairly comm<strong>on</strong><br />

c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>: “government measures other than ordinary tariffs that can potentially have an ec<strong>on</strong>omic effect<br />

<strong>on</strong> internati<strong>on</strong>al trade in goods, changing quantities traded, or prices or both.” WTO Secretariat, “Data Day at<br />

the WTO: Trade <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Market Access Data for Policy Makers,” May 18–19, 2009, 25. See also Nicita, “N<strong>on</strong><br />

Tariff <str<strong>on</strong>g>Measures</str<strong>on</strong>g>,” May 18, 2009. The c<strong>on</strong>ference definiti<strong>on</strong> distinguished n<strong>on</strong>tariff barriers as NTMs having<br />

a “protecti<strong>on</strong>ist intent.” As the <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n government <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> U.S. exporters <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> agricultural products to <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g> differ<br />

<strong>on</strong> the intent or purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n NTMs, this chapter will focus <strong>on</strong> NTMs identified as already having had an<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omic effect <strong>on</strong> existing or potential U.S. agricultural exports to <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

2 For example, in discussing U.S. exports <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> processed foods, <strong>on</strong>e industry group states that although<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n tariffs have been reduced <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n barriers to investment have decreased, regulatory barriers that<br />

effectively bar U.S. exports have simultaneously increased. Industry representative, teleph<strong>on</strong>e interview with<br />

Commissi<strong>on</strong> staff, May 8, 2009.<br />

3 A number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n NTMs examined here affect all imports, although sometimes to varying degrees.<br />

This chapter will focus <strong>on</strong> the effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n NTMs specifically <strong>on</strong> U.S. agricultural exports.<br />

4 For example, imports <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> U.S. processed agricultural goods c<strong>on</strong>taining genetically modified organisms<br />

(GMOs) would be hindered by <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n labeling regulati<strong>on</strong>s that differ from internati<strong>on</strong>ally accepted norms.<br />

Such goods are already effectively banned from the <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>n market, however, by rules <strong>on</strong> the importati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

products c<strong>on</strong>taining GMOs, thus rendering labeling regulati<strong>on</strong>s presently irrelevant as an NTM.<br />

5 Kulkarni, “N<strong>on</strong>-Tariff Barriers <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> NAMA Negotiati<strong>on</strong>s,” September 2005, 1–4; Kumar, Mukherjee,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Simi, “Negotiati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>N<strong>on</strong>tariff</str<strong>on</strong>g> Barriers Under NAMA,” 2007.<br />

6-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!