India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC
India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC
India: Effects of Tariffs and Nontariff Measures on U.S. ... - USITC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
are expected to see income growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5.8 percent per year from 2005 to 2025, while rural<br />
incomes are forecast to grow at a rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>ly 3.6 percent per year. 30<br />
Spending <strong>on</strong> Food<br />
Regardless <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> where they live, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>ns spend a substantial share <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their disposable<br />
income <strong>on</strong> food relative to other countries. For example, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>ns’ average food<br />
expenditures as a share <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their total spending were estimated to be 8 percentage points<br />
higher than those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> residents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> China in 2008. 31 However, the share <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> household<br />
expenditures that both rural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban dwellers spent <strong>on</strong> food fell in FY 2006/07 to<br />
52 percent for rural households <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 39 percent for those in urban areas (table 3.4). 32 In<br />
some regi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, there is a pr<strong>on</strong>ounced difference between urban <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural<br />
households’ food expenditures. For example, in Maharashtra the absolute amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
m<strong>on</strong>ey that urban households spent <strong>on</strong> food was more than double that spent by rural<br />
households in FY 2006/07. 33 Higher urban incomes provide <strong>on</strong>e likely explanati<strong>on</strong> for<br />
this disparity; five times as many rural households as urban <strong>on</strong>es face food inadequacy<br />
for some m<strong>on</strong>ths <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the year. 34<br />
TABLE 3.4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>: Share <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> household c<strong>on</strong>sumer expenditures spent by rural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban c<strong>on</strong>sumers <strong>on</strong> food <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
beverages, FYs 2004/05–2006/07 (%)<br />
July 2004–June 2005 July 2005–June 2006 July 2006–June 2007<br />
Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban<br />
55 43 53 40 52 39<br />
Sources: Government <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, NSSO, Household C<strong>on</strong>sumer Expenditure Am<strong>on</strong>g Socio-Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Groups <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>,<br />
FY 2004/05, August 2007; Household C<strong>on</strong>sumer Expenditure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, FY 2006/07, January 2008; <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Household<br />
C<strong>on</strong>sumer Expenditure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, FY 2006/07, October 2008.<br />
The porti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> income that rural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban households allocate to certain foods also<br />
differs. A greater percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural households’ expenditures is allocated to staple food<br />
items. Food grains were the biggest food expenditure for rural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban dwellers,<br />
c<strong>on</strong>stituting 32 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 23 percent, respectively, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> food expenditures in FY 2006/07<br />
(figs. 3.4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3.5). 35 Expenditure <strong>on</strong> dairy for urban households was 18 percent,<br />
compared to 15 percent for rural households. The greater income <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban households<br />
allows for greater shares <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>staple foods. For example, urban households spent about<br />
15 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their food budget <strong>on</strong> beverages, refreshments, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> processed foods, while<br />
rural households spent slightly less than 8 percent <strong>on</strong> these items in FY 2006/07.<br />
30 McKinsey Global Institute, “The ‘Bird <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Gold,’” May 2007, 11.<br />
31 Estimates included c<strong>on</strong>sumer expenditures <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> food, beverages, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> tobacco. EIU, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g> Food,<br />
November 11, 2008.<br />
32 The survey covered the period July 2006 through June 2007. Government <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, NSSO, Household<br />
C<strong>on</strong>sumer Expenditure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, FY 2006/07, October 2008.<br />
33 Government <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, NSSO, Household C<strong>on</strong>sumer Expenditure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, 2006/07, October 2008.<br />
34<br />
In FY 2004/05, according to the government <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, 2 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s rural households faced food<br />
inadequacy, compared with 0.4 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban households. Government <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Ministry <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Finance,<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Survey 2007–08, n.d., 246. By internati<strong>on</strong>al st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ards, however, <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> food inadequacy<br />
are much higher. For example, the World Food Programme recently reported that 35 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>ns are<br />
food insecure <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20 percent are undernourished. World Food Programme, “Countries: <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>,” 2009. It is<br />
likely that more <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these food-insecure <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> undernourished individuals live in rural areas than in urban areas.<br />
35 Government <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, NSSO, Household C<strong>on</strong>sumer Expenditure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>India</str<strong>on</strong>g>, 2006/07, October 2008.<br />
3-11